Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair

The time for ideological argument was over, said the chair of the Stronger Super Committee, Paul Costello, and the industry should work constructively to implement the Australian Government’s response to the Cooper Review.

Costello and the rest of the committee met for the first time last week with the Minister for Superannuation, Bill Shorten, and the first priority was to appoint working committees for the four reform streams to be implemented: MySuper, SuperStream, Governance and SMSFs.

While the committee will provide broad, high-level advice on the design and implementation of the reforms, the working committees will drill down into technical specifics, and give practitioners beyond those on the committee a chance for further input.

Costello said this should address any concerns about a lack of direct operational expertise on the committee, none of whom have ever run a large super fund, with the exception of course of Costello himself. (He was CEO at Superannuation Trust of Australia and New Zealand Super, before his four-year stint at the helm of the Future Fund Management Agency.)

The working committees are close to be finalised, Costello said. Their prompt formation was necessary because Costello planned to hand the Federal Treasury the Committee’s implementation recommendations by “May or June”.

The industry veteran said he wanted to be part of the Stronger Super implementation because it could help provide a better retirement for working Australians, and he urged stakeholders to keep that goal in mind.

Sponsored Content

“The [Stronger Super] report will record where there are differences in preferred approach by the committee members, but I think the Government is really interested in consensus,” he said.

Acknowledging that ‘MySuper’ was one of the most controversial aspects of the reforms, Costello said the committee would give regard to maximising the long-term net returns received by working Australians, and not just minimising the upfront costs incurred by their fund.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

One response to “Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous