Largest pension funds get bigger

Container terminal in pier

The world’s biggest funds are gaining even more market share, and arguably more influence, over the world’s pension capital. The largest 300 funds now account for 43.2 per cent of all global pension assets.

Further, the capital is becoming even more concentrated at the very top, with the largest 20 funds in the world accounting for 40.3 per cent of the assets of the Willis Towers Watson 300 ranking, the Pensions & Investments/Willis Towers Watson 300 Analysis for the year 2016 states.

The report shows that assets under management (AUM) at the world’s largest 300 funds totalled $15.7 trillion at the end of 2016, up by 6.1 per cent for the year.

The top 20 funds increased assets by an even greater proportion, 7.1 per cent, bringing their combined assets to about $6.9 trillion. These funds invest about 41.7 per cent of their assets in equities, 37.2 per cent in fixed income and 21.1 per cent in alternatives and cash.

North America remained the largest region in terms of AUM, with 44.1 per cent of all assets, including 134 US-based funds in the top 300. The Asia-Pacific region’s funds and European funds each accounted for 26.1 per cent of AUM in the top 300.

The Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan remains the largest fund in the world, with assets of more than $1.2 trillion at the end of December 2016.

Sponsored Content

The size of this fund is overwhelming, with its assets 39 per cent larger than the second fund in the ranking, the Government Pension Fund of Norway.

The P&I/WTW report states that, of the top 20 funds, nine emphasised the increased volatility and uncertainty in global markets. These funds mentioned several key factors to explain such high global market volatility.

“[The year] 2016 was truly an extraordinary investment year. Unexpected political events like Brexit and a new US administration as well as changed monetary policy signals from several central banks had a significant impact on financial markets,” said Bjarne Graven Larsen, chief investment officer of Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, which ranks number 18.

Despite the volatility, positive market returns for all major asset classes helped boost pension assets during the year.

 

2016 P&I/WTW 300 ranking (in $ million)

Rank Fund Market Total assets
1 Government Pension Investment Fund Japan $1,237,636
2 Government Pension Fund Norway $893,088
3 Federal Retirement Thrift US $485,575
4 National Pension Service South Korea $462,161
5 ABP Netherlands $404,310
6 National Social Security China $348,662
7 California Public Employees Retirement System US $306,633
8 Canada Pension Plan Canada $235,790
9 Central Provident Fund Singapore $227,102
10 PFZW Netherlands $196,461
11 California State Teachers Retirement System US $198,871
12 New York State Common US $184,461
13 Pension Fund Association for Local Government Officials Japan $183,161
14 New York City Employees’ Retirement System US $171,574
15 Employees Provident Fund Malaysia $165,464
16 State Board of Administration of Florida US $153,942
17 Teacher Retirement System of Texas US $133,221
18 Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Canada $130,642
19 Government Employees Pension Fund South Africa $119,186
20 ATP Denmark $113,160

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

How to estimate the equity risk premium

Given the importance of equity risk premium, it is surprising how haphazard the estimation of equity risk premiums remains in practice. This paper by Aswath Damodaran at the New York University Stern School of Business examines a number of different approaches to determining the equity risk premium and why different approaches yield different values. It

Previous