Large hedge funds to dominate as banks, small funds withdraw

Large, diversified hedge funds with institutional-quality operations are more likely to survive their smaller rivals as the sector continues to contract, according to a research note by Morgan Stanley.

Larger, institutional-quality managers are expected to gain market share as smaller funds continue to shut-down – a process that appears to be accelerating, Morgan Stanley writes in a January 2009 Investment Focus note.

The larger managers are more likely to commit resources to compliance and operational infrastructure than their smaller rivals as regulation of financial markets continues to evolve.

New, increasingly demanding regulation will also limit the ability of smaller managers to exploit investment opportunities.

While larger managers can also build customised trading programs to adjust to changing regulation, smaller firms must often wait for off-the-shelf trading programs to be modified by vendors.

Sponsored Content

“Institutional-quality managers, who typically possess more sophisticated risk infrastructures, have the ability to pursue non-standard means to hedge exposures and, thus, can capitalise on the greater inefficiencies created by new regulatory restrictions,” Morgan Stanley states.

The surviving hedge funds will find themselves with fewer competitors as banks, under pressure to reduce leverage and, by extension, proprietary risk-taking operations, withdraw from markets in which they once competed with hedge funds.

“While the outlook on near-term returns for hedge funds remains unclear, we believe that opportunities are abundant for investors with a longer-term time horizon to take advantage of significant distortions in the market.”

Such opportunities exist in the convertible arbitrage, bank loan and investment-grade corporate bond markets, Morgan Stanley writes.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous