Korean assets double but service providers still feel the pinch

South Korea’s fledgling corporate pension fund market, which totals only about KRW 14 trillion ($11.31 billion), will more than double by the end of this year but remains massively dominated by a few institutions.

According to a report by Towers Watson, the top four service providers in the Korean market administer about half of the funded corporate pension assets. There are 53 service provider organisations tracked in the study, including banks, insurers and securities firms.

The banks account for almost half of the assets, with the top three totalling KRW 3.9 trillion under administration. They are: Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank and Woori Bank. The largest provider is Samsung Life, whose associated companies account for more than 50 per cent of its pensions business, including the KRW 2 trillion Samsung defined benefit plan.

Towers Watson observes that the total pension assets will grow to between KRW 30-40 trillion by year’s end as large numbers of corporate sponsors switch from the legacy severance pay system because of an imminent change inn tax treatment.

Jayne Bok, director of investment services for Korea at Towers Watson said that many service providers were under enormous pressure and some might have to quit the business due to their lack of scale – notwithstanding the big increase in total assets expected soon.

Of the 53 service providers tracked for the report, 30 administer assets of less than KRW 100 billion.

Sponsored Content

Korea enacted the Employee Retirement Benefit Security Act in 2006 with a view to replacing existing severance schemes. In the past four years fund managers have been setting up dedicated retirement fund products for service provider platforms and their underlying pension clients.

As a result, the report says, at the end of 2009 there were 34 fund managers managing 255 registered retirement funds. The top 10 of these accounted for 86 per cent of total registered retirement fund assets (KRW 1.1 trillion). Eight of the managers were affiliated with large service provider organisations.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous