Korean assets double but service providers still feel the pinch

South Korea’s fledgling corporate pension fund market, which totals only about KRW 14 trillion ($11.31 billion), will more than double by the end of this year but remains massively dominated by a few institutions.

According to a report by Towers Watson, the top four service providers in the Korean market administer about half of the funded corporate pension assets. There are 53 service provider organisations tracked in the study, including banks, insurers and securities firms.

The banks account for almost half of the assets, with the top three totalling KRW 3.9 trillion under administration. They are: Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank and Woori Bank. The largest provider is Samsung Life, whose associated companies account for more than 50 per cent of its pensions business, including the KRW 2 trillion Samsung defined benefit plan.

Towers Watson observes that the total pension assets will grow to between KRW 30-40 trillion by year’s end as large numbers of corporate sponsors switch from the legacy severance pay system because of an imminent change inn tax treatment.

Jayne Bok, director of investment services for Korea at Towers Watson said that many service providers were under enormous pressure and some might have to quit the business due to their lack of scale – notwithstanding the big increase in total assets expected soon.

Of the 53 service providers tracked for the report, 30 administer assets of less than KRW 100 billion.

Sponsored Content

Korea enacted the Employee Retirement Benefit Security Act in 2006 with a view to replacing existing severance schemes. In the past four years fund managers have been setting up dedicated retirement fund products for service provider platforms and their underlying pension clients.

As a result, the report says, at the end of 2009 there were 34 fund managers managing 255 registered retirement funds. The top 10 of these accounted for 86 per cent of total registered retirement fund assets (KRW 1.1 trillion). Eight of the managers were affiliated with large service provider organisations.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous