Innovation to align investors with the social good

The CFA Institute’s president John Rogers, believes there is evidence of innovation in investment products that meet the needs of asset owners in a more sustainable, longer-term way, and points to the work of professors and advisors to the CFA , Andrew Lo of MIT and Robert Shiller of Yale.

 

One of the main thrusts of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance project is around retirement security – shining a light at the systemic level on what constitutes a sustainable retirement system. Connected, and separate to that, is a focus on innovation.

“We want to ensure that the global financial crisis doesn’t lead to reduced innovation, the industry still needs health innovation,” Rogers says. “This means investment products that meet the needs of asset owners in a more sustainable, longer-term way.”

Rogers points to the work of professor Andrew Lo, from MIT, who is an advisor to CFA Institute has applied the concepts of pooling risk in the insurance industry to a fund that would generate double-digit returns as well as invest in orphan drug development.

Lo’s fund idea is that it pools a large number of drug development efforts into a single financial entity or “mega-fund.” With the lower risk that comes from investing in multiple drug trials simultaneously, the fund yields a more attractive risk-adjusted return on the investment and a higher likelihood of success in finding cures for diseases. This, in turn, enables the fund to raise money by issuing “research-backed obligations” or RBOs, bonds guaranteed by the portfolio of possible drugs and their associated intellectual property. Because RBOs are structured as bonds, they appeal to fixed-income investors, who collectively represent a much larger pool of capital and who have traditionally not been able to participate in investments in early-stage drug development.

Sponsored Content

In his paper, Financing drug discovery for orphan diseases, numerical simulations suggest that an orphan disease mega-fund of only $575 million can yield double-digit expected rates of return with only 10–20 projects in the portfolio.

It’s an example that Rogers says uses innovation to generate returns for investors as well as align them with society and the economy at large, which is the missing link, and criticism of the finance industry – that it exists in a silo with little concern for, or even recognition of, the wider economy and society.

Similarly the work of Nobel Prize winner, Robert Shiller from Yale, produces “hard headed” solutions for social purpose, such as bonds, making them attractive to investors.

Rogers believes in an era of fiduciary capitalism, where asset owners and other institutional investors regain the power and direction of where, how and at what cost their assets are invested.

“It is hard work for institutional investors, much of their time is spent on investing and administering their portfolios in an efficient way. Asset owners should feel good, they’ve insourced and indexed to ground down costs. It is commendable but unfortunately not the whole job,” he says. “It is hard for large asset owners to move in and out of investments which leads to them owning all of the externalities, positive and negative, of the companies they own, because they are universal owners.”

He believes there is an opportunity, and challenge, for investors to engage more effectively with governance and individual issues, across industry sector and public policy debates.

“It is a really difficult task and it is too often left to simply hiring a high quality proxy firm, but that is not enough,” he says. “There are enormous business opportunities for fund managers willing to provide engagement with asset owners.”

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Holland’s hybrid: defined ambition

Jan Tamerus, actuary director at PGGM, was instrumental in developing the new Dutch pension defined-ambition structure. Back in 2006, he was involved in looking at the sustainability of the defined benefit system and in concluding it was not in fact sustainable, the idea of defined ambition evolved. One of the key reasons for not going

Previous