ING the latest to hive off funds management

Another big bank is set to hive off its funds management business to shore up its balance sheet, with this week’s announcement of the proposed divestments by ING Group.

The Dutch-based global firm announced it would either float or sell both its funds management and insurance arms within the next four years to help accelerate repayment of facilities granted to it by the Dutch Government in the middle of the financial crisis last year.

ING Investment Management is ranked 15th in the world for funds under management, as at December last year, according to an annual survey by Watson Wyatt Worldwide and Pensions and Investments magazine, with $777 billion. It has about 3,500 staff operating in 34 countries.

The proposed ING sale follows the sale by Barclays Bank of its funds management subsidiary, Barclays Global Investors, to BlackRock, which becomes the world’s largest funds manager, with $2.8 trillion, when that deal is finalised on December 1.

There were already moves afoot, however, for big broking firms to de-couple their funds management arms prior to the financial crisis because of regulatory concerns over cross-selling and the provision of advice, especially in the US.

The acquisitive BlackRock merged with the former Merrill Lynch Investment Management in 2007 and Credit Suisse Investment Management with Aberdeen Asset Management this year.

Sponsored Content

With ING, the EU was concerned it was paying too little for its state guarantee. The company will now repay half of the 10 billion euro (about $17 billion) from the Dutch government in December after it completes a 7.5 billion euro rights issue.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous