Hong Kong’s MPF member info boost

Members in the HK$365 billion ($46.8 billion) Mandatory Provident Fund, which is expected to triple in size in the next 10 years, have a new comparison tool to help them decide their service provider and investment options.

Towers Watson has launched the online comparison tool and a supporting quarterly magazine specifically targeting MPF members ahead of the implementation of the “employee choice arrangement”.

The MPF, which was started in 2000, consists of dozens of schemes operated by service provider organisations. Members receive a tax deduction for their contributions but in the past year there has been an intensifying lobbying effort to improve the attractiveness of the scheme.

For instance, in a survey of members last year, more than 60 per cent said they would contribute more if employers were willing to match their contributions or if the tax-deductible limits were raised.

Naomi Denning, Hong Kong-based managing director of investment services for Towers Watson Asia Pacific, said the objective of the tool was to encourage a long-term approach by investors, as well as proving them with the information to make appropriate choices.

Research by Towers Watson has shown that the top three drivers of member decisions were the service providers’ “brand”, past performance and fees. Other research has shown that brand and past performance, at least, offer no guide to future performance. This situation is likely to be exacerbated when the employee choice arrangement, which makes for easier switching, comes into force later this year, although there will also be greater competition between service providers.

Sponsored Content

The portal address is: www.mpfexpress.com. The magazine will be available as a PDF on the site as well as in hard copy.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous