Gunning for diversity, dynamism and due diligence

The new low-return, high-volatility environment requires broadly diversified portfolios, dynamic decision-making and rigorous due diligence, which is beyond the internal capacity of most small funds under $10 billion, warns Russell Investment’s global chief investment officer Peter Gunning.

He says smaller funds must decide if it is cost effective and even possible to internally manage investment portfolios that can successfully adapt to this new fast-changing environment.

“If you are not on this 24/7, in reality, you are going to miss opportunities,” Gunning says. “If you are waiting for the monthly meeting of the investment committee, markets might have been up and down a lot in between and you may have done nothing.”

Gunning believes the current market conditions are here to stay for at least the medium term and if funds are going to achieve their return objectives, they need to take a comprehensive look at their investment processes.

“I would argue if you are probably under $10 billion, it (insourcing investment management) is probably not worth doing. You can do it but you are doing it in a hybrid model,” he says.

Russell manages more than $150 billion for clients that typically outsource their investment decisions to the global asset manager.

Sponsored Content

 

Three-pronged approach to volatility
Managing the current environment requires a threefold response, according to Gunning.

The first is to look to greater diversity of assets, both listed and unlisted. This multi-asset solution should be implemented with what he calls an “open architecture”.

This approach ensures that the full suite of options is available in any one asset class to achieve a return objective, with the investment team not locked into any one manager or proprietary product.

Gunning says that dynamic asset allocation should involve a rebalancing back to the strategic asset allocation when valuations change, altering the weight of the particular asset class in the portfolio.

It is an approach that has been championed by the investment teams of such large funds as the $165-billion Canadian Pension Plan (CPP).

Secondly, funds should look to ensure dynamic decision-making that can adapt to fast-changing market conditions, both within an asset class and across asset classes.

“Volatility isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It just means that the investment process may need to adapt to it,” Gunning says.

“So, it is all about being more dynamic in terms of the asset allocation decisions across that diverse set of building blocks.”

Finally, Gunning says, due diligence has moved well beyond the sphere of manager selection and now demands ongoing oversight of operations to minimise risk.

In a low-return environment, part of this is due diligence to ensure efficient execution across a diversified portfolio so there is not what he calls “implementation leakage” because every basis point is crucial.

‘It is a whole lot of small things, particularly when returns are low, but they all add up,” he says.

 

Equities are not dead
Looking ahead, Gunning says that the fund is cautiously optimistic about equities that “may surprise on the upside”.

“We think that on a relative basis equities are a fairly good place to put your money,” he says.

Gunning has previously warned about the need for investors to actively manage their fixed income portfolios, saying that typical indexes expose investors to the biggest debtors.

In addition, he notes that fixed income investors should look carefully at their sovereign exposure, raising concerns that a bubble is emerging in some segments of the sovereign debt universe.

“There is definitely on the sovereign side a bond bubble developing. When you think about 10-year treasuries at 1.5 per cent and two-year government auctions going off at negative, TIPS – five-year and ten-year – are very low.”

“Interest rates can only go so far, we wouldn’t say that equities will come roaring back, but on a relative basis we are more positively disposed to equities than sovereign bonds. We do think there is a reasonable case to maintain positions in high quality corporates and high yield.”

In its fixed income portfolio, Russell currently has what Gunning describes as a “systematic overweight to credit”.

Regionally, Gunning sees that the US may provide better outcomes than Europe, which will be “difficult at best”, and, predicts a soft landing for China.

“On a relative basis, North America is probably providing the best opportunities, followed by Asia and then Europe, on the equity side.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous