Politics mars appointment of Australian SWF chair

Australian’s $A73 billion ($77 billion) sovereign wealth fund has a new Government-appointed chairman and board member in a process that has become embroiled in politics.

The new chairman, David Gonski, was originally hired by the Labor government to find a replacement for outgoing chairman, David Murray, but was eventually awarded the post in a process that other board members have strongly criticised.

Gonski, 58, and new board member Steve Harker, the head of Morgan Stanley’s Australian operations, were appointed to the board for five-year terms starting on April 3.

Harker is a former national organiser for the Federated Ironworkers Union and replaces Brian Watson on the seven-member board. Watson was the global head of equity capital market and private equity at JP Morgan.

 

Best practice?

Sponsored Content

Murray has questioned the Government’s handling of the succession, noting that he was previously approached to extend his original five-year appointment by one year 12 days before it was due to expire.

Members of the board have also expressed disquiet about the appointment process, with reports the board preferred an internal candidate be appointed to head the fund.

It is rare for the Future Fund board to enter the political domain, with board members typically keeping a low profile.

As chairman Murray, however, was prepared to enter into public debate.

He stridently criticised Australian telco Telstra and also providing commentary on the Australian government’s handling of the domestic banking industry towards the end of his tenure.

Prior to the Future Fund, Murray was the chief executive of one of the nation’s “big four” banks, Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

 

Performance issues

Under Murray’s stewardship the fund has navigated difficult investment environments but has also yet to reach its long-term return government mandate of an average return of at least the Consumer Price Index (CPI) plus 4.5 to 5.5 per cent per year.

The board has interpreted this to be an average return of CPI plus 4.5 per cent per year over rolling ten-year periods.

Since the first contribution to the fund in May 2006, the Future Fund has achieved an average return of 4.2 per cent per year.

This period includes transitioning the portfolio from cash holdings to its current diversified state.

Last year the fund achieved a return of 1.9 per cent.

The Government mandate notes that the fund may not achieve its investment aims during its “transition period” as the board develops its long-term asset allocation.

Murray has made the point that the fund is required not to take excessive risk and is well positioned over the long-term to reach its investment goals.

Murray and his board also oversaw the fund investing more in hedge fund strategies.

Its alternative investments, which are predominately hedge fund allocations, now make up almost 20 per cent of the total portfolio as of December 31.

The fund is also positioned to take advantage of investment opportunities, holding almost 14 per cent of its portfolio in cash.

The appointment of Gonski will also see a shakeup on the boards of several other corporations.

He will resign from the board of the ASX Group, which runs Australia’s stock exchange, on June 30 and as a director of Singapore Airlines in July.

Gonski, a lawyer by training served as an advisor to media magnate Kerry Packer.

He has recently chaired a body that conducted a wide ranging review of Australia’s education system.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous