Global union leader challenges funds to see big picture

As the G20 meeting looms, Sharan Burrow, general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), told delegates at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium to stop acting as if fiduciary management existed in a bubble.

“We want pension funds to do well, but they have to stop pretending fiduciary management is in a bubble,” she said.

The session was a discussion forum with Colin Tate, chief executive of Conexus Financial, publisher of Top1000funds.com, where Burrow challenged delegates to widen their view.

She said fiduciary management does not take into consideration human and labour rights or sustainable futures.

“It is not a licence to concentrate on short-term returns,” she said. “The real economy disconnect is extraordinary.”

Commenting on the Occupy Wall Street rallies, she said protests won’t stop until people are put back at the centre of sensible politics.

Sponsored Content

Burrow (pictured), who said 75 per cent of the world’s population does not have a retirement safety net, will present a solution to the G20 this week.

Burrow criticised the G20 for losing its way, saying that the promise to reform the financial sector has failed.

“There are 30 million extra unemployed because of the financial crisis,” she said. “We have the highest unemployment in history right now. Global growth is not enough to provide jobs. We all have a responsibility to do something to drive jobs growth.”

“There is a disconnect between the real economy and the financial economy,” she said.

Burrow said there needs to be global collaboration on the investment in jobs everywhere.

“It may not look the same everywhere, but there has to be global coordination,” she said.

There is $13 trillion in assets under the realm of ITUC via its members, which constitute 175 million workers.

Burrow’s presentation followed Towers Watson’s head of portfolio advisory for the Asia Pacific, Peter Ryan-Kane, who challenged delegates to extend the context of their viewpoint.

“There can’t be asset allocation without a social policy,” he said.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous