Global real estate manager looks to double Asian bets

Franklin Templeton is looking to double its real estate assets under management in the high-growth Asia Pacific region with the launch of a new fund over the next few weeks.


Jack Foster, the US-based veteran of global real estate investing who has headed up that division since 1987 (with Franklin Templeton’s predecessor company Fiduciary Investors), says the new Asian real estate fund will pick up where the first fund, which raised $300 million in 2008, left off.

The first fund still has 50 per cent in cash, although 73 per cent is committed and the manager is “not fully out with the launch” of the new fund, which is looking to raise a similar amount from institutional investors.

“Our strategy is the same,” Foster said in a visit to the region last week. “The main differences are that Japan is more of a distressed debt play rather than buying assets and the veneer has come off India.”

The funds of funds real estate specialist says the focus of the new Asian found is China and Japan, followed by Hong Kong, Singapore and Korea.

“All have different risk profiles,” Foster said. “Real estate is the most local of asset classes. There is no global pricing. That’s why the asset class has good inefficiencies to be exploited. For example, Hong Kong is more efficiently priced than China.”

Sponsored Content

Chinese real estate  “represented by long-term leases” is more transparent than several years ago but getting difficult to buy, Foster says.

The fund is a closed-end vehicle with a seven-nine-year lifespan.

Franklin Templeton tends to invest in smaller and emerging property funds which can better capture market inefficiencies.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous