Global equities lose ground to alternatives

Allocations to alternatives worldwide are expected to increase by more than 5 per cent at the expense of global equities in the next two years, according to Russell Investments 2010 global survey on alternative investing.

Infrastructure allocations are expected to increase most meaningfully relative to the other asset classes, albeit from a very low base, the also survey found.

“Infrastructure and commodities are becoming more important to institutions around the globe. They are expected to represent an important share of overall growth in allocations to alternatives through 2012, though from a very low base,” the report said.

Private equity allocations are expected to increase, especially in North America, based on a combination of valuation improvements and new commitments.

The increase in allocation to alternatives will come at the expense of global equities because the crisis highlighted the systematic risk of global equities, the survey found.

Sponsored Content

“The higher correlations between global equity sectors, styles and regions since 2008 have increased interest in alternative strategies that can help to diversify portfolios and reduce equity beta exposure, the survey said.

Reducing volatility was the main motivation for increasing allocations, according to the survey of 119 institutional investors managing a total of $1.3 trillion in assets, followed by improving returns and better risk-adjusted performance.

The survey was conducted by Russell in conjunction with McKinsey & Company.

Alternative types as a percentage of total portfolio assets

Type  2009  expected by 2012

Private equity  3.1%  4.9%

Hedge funds  4.2%  5.7%

Real estate 4.1%  6.6%

Infrastructure  0.3% 1.4%

Commodities 0.7%  1.1%

Totals  12.4%*  19.7%

*Note: the 12.4 per cent total above is the sum of allocations to each type, and it is drawn from a different survey question than the 14 per cent ‘total allocation’. The 1.6% difference may be to un-categorised alternative allocations (not assigned to a specific type).

Source: Russell Investments

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous