Global equities lose ground to alternatives

Allocations to alternatives worldwide are expected to increase by more than 5 per cent at the expense of global equities in the next two years, according to Russell Investments 2010 global survey on alternative investing.

Infrastructure allocations are expected to increase most meaningfully relative to the other asset classes, albeit from a very low base, the also survey found.

“Infrastructure and commodities are becoming more important to institutions around the globe. They are expected to represent an important share of overall growth in allocations to alternatives through 2012, though from a very low base,” the report said.

Private equity allocations are expected to increase, especially in North America, based on a combination of valuation improvements and new commitments.

The increase in allocation to alternatives will come at the expense of global equities because the crisis highlighted the systematic risk of global equities, the survey found.

Sponsored Content

“The higher correlations between global equity sectors, styles and regions since 2008 have increased interest in alternative strategies that can help to diversify portfolios and reduce equity beta exposure, the survey said.

Reducing volatility was the main motivation for increasing allocations, according to the survey of 119 institutional investors managing a total of $1.3 trillion in assets, followed by improving returns and better risk-adjusted performance.

The survey was conducted by Russell in conjunction with McKinsey & Company.

Alternative types as a percentage of total portfolio assets

Type  2009  expected by 2012

Private equity  3.1%  4.9%

Hedge funds  4.2%  5.7%

Real estate 4.1%  6.6%

Infrastructure  0.3% 1.4%

Commodities 0.7%  1.1%

Totals  12.4%*  19.7%

*Note: the 12.4 per cent total above is the sum of allocations to each type, and it is drawn from a different survey question than the 14 per cent ‘total allocation’. The 1.6% difference may be to un-categorised alternative allocations (not assigned to a specific type).

Source: Russell Investments

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous