Future Fund goes defensive

Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, the Future Fund, has lost more than $2 billion in the September quarter, as global share markets tumbled – despite reducing its equity exposure and moving more into defensive assets, such as cash.

The latest quarterly results reveal the $73.18 billion fund lost 2.9 per cent, with chairman David Murray (pictured) citing a 13 per cent drop in the Australian share market and a 14 per cent fall in global equity markets during this period.

The fund lessened the potential impact of falling equity markets by reducing its exposure to equities and increasing its cash holdings from June 30.

Over the quarter, the fund sharply reduced its overseas developed-market equity holdings by 5.2 per cent to 16.1 per cent of the portfolio. The fund also marginally reduced its exposure to Australian equities and emerging market equities.

Cash holdings were increased by 2 per cent to 10.8 per cent of the portfolio.

The fund has also continued a gradual expansion of its alternative assets, which consist of hedge fund and hedge fund-of-fund investments.

Sponsored Content

The holdings of alternative assets have risen by 3 per cent from 18.6 per cent of the portfolio to 21.6 per cent.

In the fund’s annual report, tabled in Parliament last week, the fund states that it is diversifying its hedge fund strategy beyond the distressed credit investments it made in the midst of the financial crisis.

The hedge fund strategies have been expanded to include volatility- and commodity-focused managers with active management approaches.

As of June 30, the fund’s alternative investments were split as follows:

• 26 per cent in multi-strategy/relative value;

• 31 per cent in macro directional;

• 28 per cent in distressed and event-driven;

• 9 per cent in fundamental long/short; and

• 7 per cent in commodity-orientated.

The fund has also increased its private equity holdings from 3.9 per cent of the portfolio to 5 per cent.

While the fund took a hit in the September quarter, the sovereign wealth fund enjoyed its most successful annual result since it began investing in May 2006.

In its annual report, the fund reports a nominal return of 12.8 per cent for the year to June 30.

The board’s stated investment aim is to achieve a 4.5 to 5.5 per cent average real return over rolling 10-year periods.

This latest yearly result amounts to a real return of 9.2 per cent.

Since inception the fund has achieved an average nominal return of 5.2 per cent, resulting in a real return of around 2.2 per cent.

When the fund was formed, it was noted that it may initially fall behind its stated investment goals, as it rolled out its investment strategies.

In the annual report, Murray acknowledges the fund has initially underperformed its long-term investment targets, but expresses confidence in the fund’s investment strategy.

“While performance to date is below the long-term target, it demonstrates the quality of investment returns that the fund is capable of generating,” Murray says in his chairman’s report.

“During periods when many investors have suffered significant losses, the fund has been less affected. As markets have recovered the portfolio has generated positive returns.”

The fund lost 4.2 per cent in the year of the global financial crisis, but since then has achieved double-digit annual returns and exceeded its investment aims.

Under its mandate the fund must achieve its investment results with “acceptable but not excessive levels of risk”.

Murray says the fund expects to see the current uncertainty in financial markets continue as the global economy continues to undergo “significant structural adjustment over the years to come”.

In its annual report the board says that it expects modest, below-trend growth in a number of major developed countries as these countries tackle debt reduction.

The board is more positive about the outlook for emerging markets but sees continuing market volatility – and so is positioning the portfolio defensively.

“Elevated cash levels are held as a funding source for opportunities that we anticipate an uncertain future may present, and a defensive bias is embedded within the listed equities portfolio,” the report says.

In its annual report the fund also outlines its target asset allocation for the year ahead to June 30, 2012.

These allocations are listed below and contrasted with the current holdings at September 30.

FUTURE FUND: TARGET vs ACTUAL ASSET ALLOCATION

Target allocation* Actual portfolio**
Equity 39.0% 36.5%
Listed equity 32.5% 31.5%
Private equity 6.5% 5.0%
Tangible assets 15.0% 11.9%
Debt 16.0% 19.2%
Alternatives 20% 21.6%
Cash 10% 10.8%
 * June 30, 2012 ** September 30, 2011 
Source: Future Fund

 

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous