Funds empty their clips as Sudan divides

As Sudan divides into north and south, CalPERS and other UN PRI funds are divesting shares in public companies in that country, while at the same time warning on the fragile peace and the precarious economy.

CalPERS, the US’s largest public pension fund with about $236 billion in market assets, now owns stock in only eight companies in Sudan and Iran, down from 47 companies five years ago. The amount invested has, accordingly, fallen from $2 billion to $160 million.

This sell-off has been in line with California’s divestment Acts, with Rob Feckner, CalPERS’ board president, saying the fund also would not make any new investments in the countries.

“The cost of continuing to hold the stock of these eight companies is greater than the value of divesting them,” he said.

Strong sanctions adopted last year by the US federal government, the UN and the EU prompted the withdrawal of several large multinational oil and energy companies from Sudan and Iran.

The 12 signatories, including CalPERS, to the Sudan Engagement Group (SEG) statement diplomatically urged oil companies such as CNPC/PetroChina, Sinopec, ONGC, and Petronas to do more “to address risks and opportunities associated with operating in Sudan”.

Sponsored Content

The statement congratulated companies such as Schlumberger, Total and Petrofac for their “balanced focus on economic purpose and social development in the region that, in the long run, should lead to greater benefits for all concerned”.

Shareowners could be a force for peace, said Doug Pearce, CEO/CIO of the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BC IMC), one of the members of the Sudan Engagement Group and a signatory to the statement.

“Shareowners can be instrumental in using our investment capital to be a positive force for human rights, community development and economic growth in Sudan,” he said.

The SEG statement was signed by 12 investors with $2.7 trillion in assets under management: APG, Aviva Investors, BCIMC, CalPERS, Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, Mn Services, New Zealand Superannuation Fund, PGGM Investments, Robeco, The Co-operative Asset Management, and Universities Superannuation Scheme.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous