Full transparency of big hedge fund positions from now on: AIMA

The peak body for the global hedge fund industry, the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) has backed a proposal mandating the full transparency and disclosure of ‘stematically significant’ positions and risk exposures held by hedge funds to their national regulators.

The principle is one of many positions announced in a new AIMA policy platform, formulated while representing the global hedge fund industry in international discussions about the future regulatory framework for hedge funds.

The talks were tasked by the G20 and are being convened by organisations such as International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the Financial Stability Forum.

The new policies put forward by AIMA were:

1) Regular reporting and better transparency of systematically significant positions held by large hedge funds to their national regulators;

2) An aggregated short-selling disclosure regime to national regulators;

Sponsored Content

3) Support for new policies to reduce settlement failure (encompassing naked short-selling);

4) Support for a “global manager-authorisation and supervision template” based on the UK’s Financial Services Authority; and

5) Call for unified global standards for the industry based on the convergence of work by AIMA, IOSCO, the Hedge Fund Standards Board, the US President’s Working Group on Financial Markets and the Managed Funds Association.

In a statement, Andrew Baker, the chief executive of AIMA based in London, said the peak body supported the disclosure measures in order to improve unfavourable perceptions of hedge funds.

“We want to dispel the misconception that the hedge fund industry is opaque and uncooperative,” Baker said.

AIMA’s 1,200 members, which include hedge funds, prime brokers and fund administrators, manage more than 75 per cent of hedge fund assets globally.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous