France’s FFR halves equities, weights bonds

Equities allocations have been slashed as a result of government changes to the liabilities of the Fonds de Reserve pour les Retraites (FFR) which prompted changes to the fund’s investment policy.

The new portfolio, approved in December 2010, more than halved the allocation to equities from 45 per cent to 21 per cent. It substantially increased allocations to bonds from 45 per cent to 73.9 per cent while commodities and real estate were both decreased from 5 per cent to 3.5 per cent and 1.8 per cent respectively.

This new portfolio was adopted in the belief that it would satisfy FRR’s liabilities which now entail 14 annual payments of €2.1 billion ($2.9 billion) to the Caisee d’Amotissement de la Dette Sociale (national social debt amortisation fund – CADES).

The fund – which totalled $51.6 billion at the end of last year – was created to meet the challenges of funding the mandatory retirement PAYGO plans.

As well as meeting the FRR’s liabilities, the changes to the strategic allocation are expected to provide an expected annualised return of 6 per cent, a decrease from the expected 6.3 per cent outlined in the 2009 policy.

It will be seen this year if the FRR is successful in its purpose of propping the French pension system up, with its annual payments to CADES commencing. The payments must be made each year by October until 2018, as outlined by a government set timetable, and will help CADES finance the deficits of the bodies which run the basic old age pension.

Sponsored Content

The breakdown of the new portfolio is as follows:

–          Commodities: 3.5 per cent

–          Real estate: 1.8 per cent

–          Emerging countries debt: 5.3 per cent

–          High yield debt: 3.5 per cent

–          Equities (including private equity): 21.0 per cent

–          Corporate bonds (Inv. Grade): 16.3 per cent

–          OECD Sovereign Bonds: 16.3 per cent

–          Cashflow-matched French Treasury Bonds (OAT): 32.5 per cent

One response to “France’s FFR halves equities, weights bonds”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous