Florida benefits from equities overweights

The $110 billion Florida Retirement System Pension Plan (FRS PP) outperformed its policy benchmark by 10 basis points in the September quarter, thanks to overweight allocations to domestic and international equities.

For the June to September quarter, the fund increased its allocation to domestic equities by more than 2 per cent, moving from a market value of $35.144 billion to $40.810 billion, the result of slight reductions in high yield (0.5 per cent), real estate (1 per cent) and cash.

According to a memorandum from executive director and chief investment officer, Ash Williams, to the State Board of Administration of Florida (SBA), in the past 12 months the fund has taken 252 basis points in active risk, with market risk accounting for 2,019 basis points.

For the 12 months to September the fund had a total net return of -0.47 per cent, lagging its performance target by 55 basis points.

From June 2007 the fund has an absolute return target based on an actuarial assessment that FRS PP investments must on average appreciate by 5 per cent per year in excess of the rate of inflation to meet the SBA’s long-term investment objectives. This is up from 4 per cent from 2003 to 2007.

Sponsored Content

In the past quarter the fund, which has increased by $10.47 billion, only rebalanced portfolios once, with foreign equities transferring $713.5 million to fixed income ($693.3 million) and domestic equities ($20.2 million).

One of the more interesting activities for the fund during this year was the decision by the strategic investment staff to allocate capital to corporate activist hedge fund managers. The fund has an allocation of 3.5 per cent, or $3.8 billion, to strategic investments.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous