European asset allocators fall short of academic best practice

Investment managers in Europe fail to employ techniques that avoid generating overly-concentrated portfolios because of poor input estimation, and do not fully take into account extreme risks when constructing portfolios, according to research by the EDHEC Risk and Management Research Centre.

EDHEC found that European managers and investors acknowledged that their current asset allocation techniques fell short of the state of the art in portfolio management techniques, highlighting a gap between the academic and practical elements of funds management.

Further, feedback from practitioners found that 95 per cent shared EDHEC’s opinion that improvements must be made on the front of portfolio construction practices, in relative risk management, advanced portfolio construction techniques, and VaR calculation and covariance estimation.

Of the professionals responding, 86 per cent said that further education and effort on the part of investment managers are a highly importance means of closting the gap between real-world practice and ivory-tower research. But 79 per cent said that better explanations of the practical applications of academic research are also highly important.

EDHEC Business School is recognised as a centre of excellence for asset management and alternative investment research. In partnership with large institutions, the research centre brings together 45 researchers and implements six industry-sponsored programs and 10 research chairs focusing on asset allocation and risk management in the traditional and alternative investment universe.

Sponsored Content

The EDHEC Eruopean Investment Practices Survey, and the subsequent practitioner’s questionnaire was done in conjunction with Newedge, a brokerage affiliate of Calyon and Societe Generale.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous