Endowments need to think short term to counteract GFC

Endowments and foundations need to adapt their investment policies to incorporate more short-term alterations as a way to meet liquidity challenges presented by the global financial crisis, according to new research by Russell Investments.

Heather Myers, director of endowment and foundation strategy at Russell Investments, said traditional sources of liquidity have dried up in the past year, and endowments should review how they will meet their spending needs.

The liquidity pressure has come in many forms, including investment income and decreasing charitable contributions, and will force fiduciaries of endowments to approach their investments with a more short-term outlook, something they do not traditionally do.

“Non-profit entities need to carefully assess their spending policies and understand the true need for liquidity as well as the true liquidity of their portfolio,” Myers said.

“On the investment front, now may be a time for tactical manoeuvring where interim, short to medium term restrictions are not in play. Once we are in a more stable environment, endowments and foundations can consider reverting back to established strategic allocations.”

The report says endowments and foundations are challenged by the fact that the largest component of additions to their investment pools in appreciation and investment income have weakened.

Sponsored Content

In addition, charitable contributions have experienced a steep downturn, and even short-term bond funds where operating cash is often invested have been hit hard and in some cases frozen.

“The industry is facing unprecedented times, and with traditional sources of liquidity less available, fiduciaries of non-profit portfolios have to review how they’ll meet their spending needs,” Myers said.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous