Emerging and frontier markets continue darling run

Global equity markets significantly underperformed emerging and frontier markets in 2010, evidenced by MSCI Indices end of  year data, with some emerging markets returning as much as 50 per cent and some frontier markest returning 70 per cent for the year.While overall global equity markets continued to recover, the MSCI data demonstrated that emerging and frontier markets recovered more strongly than developed markets in 2010.

The MSCI Thailand and MSCI Peru indices were the strongest performers among the emerging markets, posting returns of 49.9 per cent and 47.8 per cent respectively. While within this market segment, the MSCI Hungary index was ranked the poorest performer, with a return of -12.0 per cent with the MSCI Czech Republic index coming in next with a -11.0 per cent return.

Frontier markets made a comeback in 2010 after significantly lagging behind developed and emerging markets in 2009 with a return of 7.0 per cent. Overall they more than doubled this, posting a return of 18.3 per cent.

The MSCI Sri Lanka index was the top performer for frontier markets, posting a 73.2 per cent return, with the MSCI Bahrain index last among the frontier classification with a return of -23.0 per cent.

Within developed markest the US index returned 13.21 per cent, outperforming the European index which suffered due to the sovereign debt crisis. Despite that, Sweden was named the top performing index among developed markets, posting a return of 29.0 per cent.

The MSCI global small cap indexes repeated the success of 2009 in outperforming the MSCI global standard (large + mid cap) indexes across all regions. The MSCI small cap index outpaced its large and mid cap counterpart, MSCI ACWI, by more than 10 percentage points, posting returns of 23.2 per cent compared to MSCI ACWI’s return of 9.7 per cent. The large cap indices have a challenge in the coming year if it is to prevent the MSCI global small cap indices from completing an outperformance hat trick in the coming year.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous