Emerging and frontier markets continue darling run

Global equity markets significantly underperformed emerging and frontier markets in 2010, evidenced by MSCI Indices end of  year data, with some emerging markets returning as much as 50 per cent and some frontier markest returning 70 per cent for the year.While overall global equity markets continued to recover, the MSCI data demonstrated that emerging and frontier markets recovered more strongly than developed markets in 2010.

The MSCI Thailand and MSCI Peru indices were the strongest performers among the emerging markets, posting returns of 49.9 per cent and 47.8 per cent respectively. While within this market segment, the MSCI Hungary index was ranked the poorest performer, with a return of -12.0 per cent with the MSCI Czech Republic index coming in next with a -11.0 per cent return.

Frontier markets made a comeback in 2010 after significantly lagging behind developed and emerging markets in 2009 with a return of 7.0 per cent. Overall they more than doubled this, posting a return of 18.3 per cent.

The MSCI Sri Lanka index was the top performer for frontier markets, posting a 73.2 per cent return, with the MSCI Bahrain index last among the frontier classification with a return of -23.0 per cent.

Within developed markest the US index returned 13.21 per cent, outperforming the European index which suffered due to the sovereign debt crisis. Despite that, Sweden was named the top performing index among developed markets, posting a return of 29.0 per cent.

The MSCI global small cap indexes repeated the success of 2009 in outperforming the MSCI global standard (large + mid cap) indexes across all regions. The MSCI small cap index outpaced its large and mid cap counterpart, MSCI ACWI, by more than 10 percentage points, posting returns of 23.2 per cent compared to MSCI ACWI’s return of 9.7 per cent. The large cap indices have a challenge in the coming year if it is to prevent the MSCI global small cap indices from completing an outperformance hat trick in the coming year.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous