Dutch shake up pension system

The Dutch Government, some unions and employers have agreed on a deal to radically reform the Dutch pension system, with the formerly defined-benefit scheme edging towards a more hybrid defined-contribution arrangement.

Employees must now share some of the risk, with corporate pensions no longer guaranteed against market downturns.

Market downturns will be spread over a 10-year period, with companies and employees able to set risk/return levels for their respective funds.

The winding up of the centrally-controlled system will provide major challenges for funds both in terms of deciding investment strategy, handling the liability side of their balance sheets but also communicating with members.

Premiums will also be split between workers (one-third) and employers (two-thirds) and employers will no longer have to bear the risk of a downturn and have to top-up funding levels.

It is hoped these changes will avoid the so-called “crunch” that underfunded Dutch pension funds found themselves in 2008 and 2009.

Sponsored Content

The Dutch Government also announced that the state pension age would go up from 65 to 66 by 2020 and flagged a further increase to 67 by 2025.

State pensions would also rise 0.6 per cent plus inflation per year from 2013 to 2028.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) described the deal as the biggest shake up of the Dutch pension system since World War II and said it was a deal involving hundreds of millions of euros.

Major general workers’ union FNV Bondgenoten has recommended its 1.4 million members reject the deal, saying it does not provide enough assurances on payouts.

The deal must still be passed by the Dutch Parliament and will be also need to be approved by a number of unions.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Dump cap-weighted indexing for ‘efficient beta’

  The status quo of ‘passive’ equity investment, ranking companies by market capitalisation, is delivering lower returns for higher volatility than a beta strategy which blends a cap-weighted approach with two of its competitors – minimum variance and fundamental indexing. Michael Bailey spoke to Lazard Asset Management’s Asia Pacific chief, Rob Prugue, about a paper co-written

Dump cap-weighted indexing for ‘efficient beta’

The status quo of ‘passive’ equity investment, ranking companies by market capitalisation, is delivering lower returns for higher volatility than a beta strategy which blends a cap-weighted approach with two of its competitors – minimum variance and fundamental indexing. Michael Bailey spoke to Lazard Asset Management’s Asia Pacific chief, Rob Prugue, about a paper co-written

HMC strengthens internal investment support with IT hires

The Harvard Management Company (HMC) is looking to fill 12 new IT positions across trading, risk and portfolio management in a move that strengthens its internal investment support structure even more. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Texas investment pros given room for bigger bonuses

The chief investment officer and senior investment professionals at the $88 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas can earn up to 125 per cent of their base salary in performance compensation, under a new version of the fund’s pay rules. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Sweden’s AP3 on the hunt for active credit exposures

The $27.3 billion Tredje AP-Fonden (AP3) of Sweden has instituted a search for active fixed income managers to run portfolios of US, European and UK credit. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No free lunch in asset allocation

In his editorial for the November/December issue of the Financial Analysts Journal, Richard Ennis confidently consigns the term “uncorrelated return” to the scrap heap of asset allocation lingo, reminding readers there is no free lunch in asset allocation, and that in order to collect the risk premium, investors must also bear the risk.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content

Previous