Desperate times for US corporate plans

Investments of more than $100 billion are required to rebalance the equity allocations of the largest US corporate defined benefit plans, as they join their international peers, registering record losses for 2008 and pushing them deep into underfunded territory.

Milliman’s Pension Funding Study showed that due to market declines, the percentage of corporate pension plan assets invested in equities declined from 55 to 44 per cent during 2008.

According to the study’s co-author, Paul Morgan of Evaluation Associates, a Milliman company, a return to a 55 per cent equity allocation by the end of 2009 – either through new investments or portfolio rebalancing – would require a $100 billion investment in the equity markets.

Results from this study, Milliman’s ninth, show the US’s largest corporate defined benefit retirement plans registered record losses, of more than $300 billion in 2008, wiping out the entire gains from the preceding five years.

According to the study’s other co-author, John Ehrhardt, asset losses drove a decrease in funded status from about 106 per cent at the end of 2007 to less than 80 per cent at the end of 2008.

Sponsored Content

“Losses continued into 2009 with more than a $30 billion decrease in funded status in the first two months of this year. At the end of February, the funded status of the Milliman 100 pension plans stood at 74 per cent, the lowest level since May 2003,” he said.

The losses in funded status during 2008, coupled with the new funding requirements under the Pension Protection Act, are projected to increase required contributions to more than $50 billion for 2009.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Agent provocateur

Paul Smith, the Hong Kong based chief executive of the Global CFA Society is on an evangelical mission to change the culture within the investment industry. Not only is he looking to curb the frequency of excess behaviour that leaves the public cynical of high paid finance professionals, but he is a persuasive advocate for

Do long-term mandates produce better results?

About 11 years ago, the Towers Watson’s Thinking Ahead Group came up with the concept of investors appointing managers for 10-year mandates. The consulting arm then started talking to clients about it in 2004/05 and the early mandates have now matured. So did it work? Do longer-term mandates produce outperformance, better behaviour and more security?

GRESB infrastructure launch

A new infrastructure sustainability benchmark has been developed by a group of eight institutional investors, alongside GRESB, to enable systematic evaluation and industry benchmarking of the sustainability performance of their infrastructure assets.   Despite large and widespread allocations by Canadian and Australian pension funds to infrastructure, institutional investors globally do not have large allocations to

Frozen by the entanglement of risk

Equity prices in continental Europe and emerging markets, including China, are below fair value, and present an opportunity for investors, but the ‘entanglement of risk’ in current markets is making Brian Singer, partner and head of dynamical allocation strategies team, William Blair cautious. William Blair typically targets around 10 per cent volatility in its portfolios,

Exchanges need to adapt to institutional demands: Norges

Institutional investors now dominate the free float holdings of listed companies and exchanges need to adapt to this enduring change in market structure and investor needs, according to Norges Bank Investment Management, manager of the $818 billion Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. Norges Bank, which itself owns around 1 per cent of the world’s listed stock,

Dalio says Fed should focus on secular forces

The US Federal Reserve is not paying enough attention to secular forces affecting the market, according to chairman and founder of Bridgewater, Ray Dalio, who says the “risks of the world being at or near the end of its long-term debt cycle are significant”. In an opinion piece posted on LinkedIn, The Dangerous Long Bias

Previous