Desperate times for US corporate plans

Investments of more than $100 billion are required to rebalance the equity allocations of the largest US corporate defined benefit plans, as they join their international peers, registering record losses for 2008 and pushing them deep into underfunded territory.

Milliman’s Pension Funding Study showed that due to market declines, the percentage of corporate pension plan assets invested in equities declined from 55 to 44 per cent during 2008.

According to the study’s co-author, Paul Morgan of Evaluation Associates, a Milliman company, a return to a 55 per cent equity allocation by the end of 2009 – either through new investments or portfolio rebalancing – would require a $100 billion investment in the equity markets.

Results from this study, Milliman’s ninth, show the US’s largest corporate defined benefit retirement plans registered record losses, of more than $300 billion in 2008, wiping out the entire gains from the preceding five years.

According to the study’s other co-author, John Ehrhardt, asset losses drove a decrease in funded status from about 106 per cent at the end of 2007 to less than 80 per cent at the end of 2008.

Sponsored Content

“Losses continued into 2009 with more than a $30 billion decrease in funded status in the first two months of this year. At the end of February, the funded status of the Milliman 100 pension plans stood at 74 per cent, the lowest level since May 2003,” he said.

The losses in funded status during 2008, coupled with the new funding requirements under the Pension Protection Act, are projected to increase required contributions to more than $50 billion for 2009.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous