Defined benefit still dominates largest funds

Defined benefit funds still dominate the structure of the largest 300 pension funds globally, and this troop of large funds now make up almost half of all pension assets around the world.

The total assets of the world’s largest 300 pension funds grew by 11 per cent in 2010 to a total of $12.5 trillion, an all-time high, according to this year’s P&I/Towers Watson global 300 ranking.

Defined benefit funds still account for 70 per cent of assets, and grew by 8 per cent last year. Defined contribution funds grew by 11 per cent.

There is a geographical shift underway in the dominance of pension assets, and while the US still has the largest share of pension assets, with 34 per cent, this has declined from 45 per cent only five years ago.

Europe has had the highest five-year growth rate of 11 per cent.

An analysis of the annualised growth rates of the countries that make up the top 20 shows funds in China recorded a massive 38.9 per cent growth rate. The next largest was Norway with 18.5 per cent.

Sponsored Content

There was little shift in the rankings of the largest funds, with the Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan still the largest fund – at $1.4 trillion it is nearly three times the next largest – a position it has held for the past eight years.

Notable movements in the rankings were the Canada Pension Plan which moved from 12th to 8th; the GEPF of South Africa which moved from 18th to 15th; and the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan which moved in to the top 20 from 22nd (it replaced the General Motors).

According to global head of investment at Towers Watson, Carl Hess, the asset allocation of these large funds has shifted to a more conservative status over the past five years. The top 20 funds, on average, now have an equal amount in equities and bonds (about 40 per cent in each) with the remainder in alternatives and cash, he says.

 

P&I/Towers Watson 300 ranking ($US millions)

Rank Fund Total Assets
1 Government Pension Investment Fund, Japan $1,432,122
2 Government Pension Fund Global, Norway $550,858
3 ABP, Netherlands $318,807
4 National Pension Fund, Korea $289,418
5 Federal Retirement Thrift Savings Plan, US $264,013
6 CalPERS, US $214,387
7 Local Government Officials, Japan $189,633
8 Canada Pension Plan, Canada $149,142
9 Employees Provident Fund, Malaysia $145, 570
10 Central Provident Fund, Singapore $144,844
11 CalSTRS, US $138,888
12 New York State Common, US $133,023
13 PFZW, Netherlands $133,002
14 National Social Security, China $129,789
15 GEPF, South Africa $128,232
16 Pension Fund Association, Japan $124, 987
17 ATP, Denmark $123, 757
18 Florida State Board, US $123,373
19 New York City Retirement, US $115,024
20 Ontario Teachers, Canada $108,148

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous