Defensive setting, anaemic growth

Global pension funds continue to have a defensive asset allocation, reflected in the anaemic growth in the total assets of the world’s largest 300 pension funds by less than 2 per cent in 2011, new Towers Watson research reveals.

The P&I/ Towers Watson Global 300 research reveals that concerns about ongoing uncertainty in global markets remains, with last year’s growth in assets down from 11 per cent in 2010.

Aside from the global financial crisis, it was the lowest annual growth rate since 2003.

Defined-benefit assets still account for the vast majority of assets, but are growing at a slower rate than defined contribution.

Defined-benefit (DB) funds account for 70 per cent of total assets, growing by over 1 per cent in 2011, compared to 8 per cent the previous year.

Defined-contribution (DC) assets grew by 4 per cent, driven in part by a long-term shift in pension assets away from costly DB schemes. This growth, however, was well below the 13 per cent recorded the previous year.

Sponsored Content

 

Asian high

The asset consultant’s research reveals that the Asia-Pacific has the highest five-year growth rate of 9 per cent, compared to Europe at 6 per cent, while North America remained virtually unchanged.

Assets held by Australian funds grew at the fastest rate during the five-year period to the end of 2011, 18 per cent in US dollar terms, followed by Brazilian with 14 percent.

Carl Hess, global head of investment at Towers Watson, notes that asset allocation at the world’s largest pension funds had grown much more defensive over the past six or seven years as a result of the ongoing uncertainty shrouding the global economy.

“The top 20 funds, on average, now have roughly equal amounts in equities and bonds (about 40 per cent each) and the rest in alternatives and cash. At the same time Asia-Pacific funds, in particular Japan, have maintained much higher allocations to bonds in keeping with prevailing investment beliefs there,” Hess says.

Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund maintains its top ranking as the world’s largest fund with total assets of about $1.4 trillion.

This is followed by Norway’s Government Pension fund and the Netherland’s APB rounded out the top three.

 

New entrants

The research shows that 47 new funds entered the ranking during the past five years mainly from Australia (8), Mexico (4), Germany (4), Finland (2) and Russia (2). During the same period, the US had a net loss of 19 funds from the ranking, yet it still accounts for 121 funds in the research. The UK is the next highest with 27 funds, down two funds from five years ago.

Hess says funds are reacting to the low-growth economic outlook and market volatility by increasing their capacity to make dynamic asset-allocation decisions.

“Many of the top funds are prioritising governance and risk-management arrangements as a matter of urgency, spurred on by the increasing likelihood of benefit default if they don’t,” he says.

The Towers Watson research, released in January, shows that bond allocations in the world’s seven biggest pension markets have fallen by 3 per cent on aggregate over the past 16 years, to 37 per cent.

 

Out of equities

However, over this same period equity allocations have fallen by 8 per cent to 41 per cent.

The greatest shift out of equities has occurred in the UK and the US where allocations have fallen from the mid-to-high sixties to now less than 45 per cent.

Japan maintains the highest allocation to bonds, with 59 per cent of the country’s total pension assets in bonds.

The shift out of equities has resulted in higher allocations to alternative assets, especially real estate, according to the research.

Towers Watson found that across the seven biggest pension markets, allocations to real estate, hedge funds, private equity and commodities has grown from 5 per cent to 20 per cent since 1995.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous