Defensive setting, anaemic growth

Global pension funds continue to have a defensive asset allocation, reflected in the anaemic growth in the total assets of the world’s largest 300 pension funds by less than 2 per cent in 2011, new Towers Watson research reveals.

The P&I/ Towers Watson Global 300 research reveals that concerns about ongoing uncertainty in global markets remains, with last year’s growth in assets down from 11 per cent in 2010.

Aside from the global financial crisis, it was the lowest annual growth rate since 2003.

Defined-benefit assets still account for the vast majority of assets, but are growing at a slower rate than defined contribution.

Defined-benefit (DB) funds account for 70 per cent of total assets, growing by over 1 per cent in 2011, compared to 8 per cent the previous year.

Defined-contribution (DC) assets grew by 4 per cent, driven in part by a long-term shift in pension assets away from costly DB schemes. This growth, however, was well below the 13 per cent recorded the previous year.

Sponsored Content

 

Asian high

The asset consultant’s research reveals that the Asia-Pacific has the highest five-year growth rate of 9 per cent, compared to Europe at 6 per cent, while North America remained virtually unchanged.

Assets held by Australian funds grew at the fastest rate during the five-year period to the end of 2011, 18 per cent in US dollar terms, followed by Brazilian with 14 percent.

Carl Hess, global head of investment at Towers Watson, notes that asset allocation at the world’s largest pension funds had grown much more defensive over the past six or seven years as a result of the ongoing uncertainty shrouding the global economy.

“The top 20 funds, on average, now have roughly equal amounts in equities and bonds (about 40 per cent each) and the rest in alternatives and cash. At the same time Asia-Pacific funds, in particular Japan, have maintained much higher allocations to bonds in keeping with prevailing investment beliefs there,” Hess says.

Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund maintains its top ranking as the world’s largest fund with total assets of about $1.4 trillion.

This is followed by Norway’s Government Pension fund and the Netherland’s APB rounded out the top three.

 

New entrants

The research shows that 47 new funds entered the ranking during the past five years mainly from Australia (8), Mexico (4), Germany (4), Finland (2) and Russia (2). During the same period, the US had a net loss of 19 funds from the ranking, yet it still accounts for 121 funds in the research. The UK is the next highest with 27 funds, down two funds from five years ago.

Hess says funds are reacting to the low-growth economic outlook and market volatility by increasing their capacity to make dynamic asset-allocation decisions.

“Many of the top funds are prioritising governance and risk-management arrangements as a matter of urgency, spurred on by the increasing likelihood of benefit default if they don’t,” he says.

The Towers Watson research, released in January, shows that bond allocations in the world’s seven biggest pension markets have fallen by 3 per cent on aggregate over the past 16 years, to 37 per cent.

 

Out of equities

However, over this same period equity allocations have fallen by 8 per cent to 41 per cent.

The greatest shift out of equities has occurred in the UK and the US where allocations have fallen from the mid-to-high sixties to now less than 45 per cent.

Japan maintains the highest allocation to bonds, with 59 per cent of the country’s total pension assets in bonds.

The shift out of equities has resulted in higher allocations to alternative assets, especially real estate, according to the research.

Towers Watson found that across the seven biggest pension markets, allocations to real estate, hedge funds, private equity and commodities has grown from 5 per cent to 20 per cent since 1995.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous