Cost saving on radar for Canada’s PSP as more assets come inhouse

The C$41 billion ($38 billion) Public Sector Pension Investment Board plans to bring more assets in house in a bid to lower costs, and will increase the number of direct investments to increase control, the chair Paul Cantor said at the annual public meeting.

Cantor said managing assets internally represented substantial savings when compared to having external portfolio managers manage assets.

“If we outsourced all of PSP Investments’ asset management to outside fund managers, it would cost an additional $135 million in management fees per year, after taking into account the savings in salaries and benefits,” he said.

In addition to bringing more assets in house it plans to increase the proportion of internal active management in public markets and implement a “value opportunity investing strategy”.

The fund is increasingly bringing functions in house with the development of a new internal function for asset-liability modelling one such example.

Sponsored Content

According to Cantor, speaking at the meeting, one of the key corporate objectives for fiscal year 2010 is to define a policy portfolio, within an asset-liability framework, taking into account the liabilities of the plans and optimising the policy portfolio structure. As well as develop internal asset-liability capabilities and a model.

For the first six months of the 2010 financial year the PSP recorded a return of 15 per cent.

The fund has a target policy of investing 62 per cent world equity (with about 30 per cent in domestic equities), 15 per cent in nominal fixed income, and 23 per cent in real return assets, which includes world inflation-linked bonds, real estate and infrastructure.

PSP Investments also has a new product committee such that any new investment or financial instruments may need to be reviewed by the committee and approved by management. That list then goes to the investment committee on an annual basis.

PSIP Investments continues to undergo an enterprise risk management initiative that began in 2008, and has completed a strategic investment-related process to identify, prioritise and review appropriate recommendations to mitigate risk.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous