Consultant warns of PPIP risks

The Pension Consulting Alliance is warning clients to exercise caution in investing in the Public-Private Investment Program, advising that other opportunistic fixed income investments offer a better risk/return profile.


In a letter to clients, the US consulting firm said lack of investment liquidity was a key concern, with investors facing a long lock-up period of eight years while still being subject to potential capital calls.

In addition they were complex structured securities requiring high levels of scrutiny, contained leverage and some uncertainty associated with price discovery, and were in a highly volatile and illiquid market.

The consultant also warned there could be potential for high investment management fees and misalignment of interest.

Under the program the government will make $30 billion available in one-to-one financing available to the nine managers to buy troubled securities from financial institutions.

The selected managers have up to three months to raise at least $500 million from private investors, which PCA said was a tight deadline in which to evaluate PPIP investments.

Sponsored Content

PCA’s analysis of the underlying assets, which are legacy senior residential mortgage-backed securities and senior commercial mortgage-backed securities which have fallen dramatically in price during the economic downturn, shows they will continue to exhibit significant credit and default risks.

While there are some benefits to the PPIP mortgage securities program, including potentially large returns and no mark-to-market accounting, PCA also said manager selection issues were heightened.

Only a small number of funds managers have been selected, which greatly limits the breadth of manager selection usually exercised, PCA said.

The managers participating in the initial round of the program are:

  • AllianceBernstein, LP and
    its sub-advisors Greenfield Partners, LLC and Rialto Capital Management, LLC;
  • Angelo, Gordon & Co.,
    L.P. and GE Capital Real Estate;
  • BlackRock, Inc.;
  • Invesco Ltd.;
  • Marathon Asset Management, L.P.;
  • Oaktree Capital Management,
    L.P.;
  • RLJ Western Asset
    Management, LP.;
  • The TCW Group, Inc.; and
  • Wellington Management
    Company, LLP.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CalPERS sharpens risk, liability tools

After watching the simultaneous declines of its market value and funded status during the financial crisis, the $204.8 billion CalPERS will conduct a full review of the methodologies underpinning its asset liability management (ALM) process. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Wilshire paints dire picture for state retirement systems

Wilshire Consulting’s annual report on US state retirement systems reveals near-universal underfunding, leavened only slightly by the 19.5 per cent rally in global equity markets in the eight months since its cut-off date. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

OMERS overwhelms with underperformance

OMERS Strategic Investments, the investment entity of the C$47 billion ($45 billion) Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) focused on co-investment opportunities in private markets, has dramatically underperformed its benchmark for the year. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Risk parity becomes bittersweet flavour of the month

A risk parity approach to asset allocation is flavour of the month, in spite, and because, of the leverage it requires. Amanda White explores the topic.

Institutions worldwide rethink passive exposures: Towers Watson

The number of bond mandates awarded by institutional funds shot up by more than 50 per cent in 2009 as credit markets provided attractive investment opportunities, while the amount of passive allocations made by institutions increased fourfold in the past two years, according to Towers Watson.   mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DC plans must look at governance and design

Towers Watson’s Roger Urwin and Gordon Clark from the University of Oxford are finalising their fourth collaboration on global best practice for defined contribution plans. Amanda White spoke with Roger Urwin about the inefficiencies in plan design. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous