Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better.

This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs a consultancy advising both domestic and foreign investors on acquisitions, tax and compliance.

The need for such partnerships is not just because of the way these funds have grown in line with the relentless rise in the Chinese economy since 1998, but to their high weighting to overseas assets in mining, real estate, infrastructure and private equity.

The Chinese Investment Corporation (CIC) in its last published accounts, for the year ending 2012, had a 32.4 per cent weighting to the grouping of “long term investments”.

These assets fit in with its stated investment aims, which place repeated and strong emphasis on its dedication to the long term, but also to its aversion to losing money – it is looking at sure bets that will pay out for decades to come.

In this way, CIC purchased a 10 per cent stake in Heathrow Airport, in London, the third busiest airport in the world and has purchased resources with expected growth in demand and potential scarcity, such as mining, water and agriculture.

Sponsored Content

Wadley estimates a typical long-term target return on direct investments for Chinese sovereign wealth funds is the inflation of the G20 nations plus 1 per cent.

This focus on the long term makes a sharp contrast to Western thinking. He estimates the short-term for Chinese sovereign wealth funds is defined as three years, the mid-term 10 years and the long-term can cover several generations.

Long-term business relationships, a staple of Chinese business life are also key. In entering into such foreign investments, Chinese sovereign wealth funds are looking for co-investors will have local contacts and local expertise to the assets in question, says Wadley, and ideally foreign government backing too.

For such investments, he estimates the “sweet spot” is a 30-40 per cent stake worth around $200 million.

The importance of personal contacts in making business decisions cannot be over-emphasised in China and those investors looking to work in partnership with Chinese sovereign wealth funds should commit to a long-term relationship with plenty of contact.

“You cannot communicate enough,” he says. “If you are thinking about co-investing put a lot of time in, meeting three times a year is not enough, you really need a representative on the ground,” he says.

One of the rewards for meeting such standards of long-term partnerships, is to receive far more detail than is publicly available from Chinese sovereign wealth funds, whose annual reports do not to disclose the names of external fund managers and advisers.

“If you want to know the detail you have got to get to know them, rather than go to the website. If you have the right credentials and background they are very willing to get to know you,” says Wadley.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

Previous