China expert warns on bad positioning

While the China-growth story was not new, an expert in investing in the region said investors should consider if their current exposure to the economic giant took advantage of where future growth was predicted to occur.

Michael Jiang (pictured), a portfolio manager at the Hong Kong-based Harvest Fund Management told attendees at the Conexus Financial Fiduciary Investors Symposium that many fund managers may be unaware that they are poorly positioned to take advantage of the expected boom in consumer demand in China.

Harvest is a thematic investor and stock picker which targets predominately Hong Kong and overseas-listed mainland companies.

Jiang is a Beijing-based portfolio manager responsible for the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) fund.

The fund raises money from mainland mutual fund investors and invests it overseas, primarily in Chinese companies listed overseas.

Jiang said many fund managers that tracked common indexes such as the MSCI China, CSI 300 and HSCEI might not realise that these indexes were typically overweight financial and energy sector and underweight potential future growth sectors.

Sponsored Content

On aggregate, the financials and energy sectors represented 41 per cent of the CSI 300, 56 per cent of the MSCI China and 81 per cent of the HSCEI.

“While both these sectors have been important beneficiaries of China’s fast growing economy they may underperform at certain stages of the economic cycle,” Jiang said.

Furthermore, Jiang said broader indexes such as the MSCI World index were underweight China, with the index having just a 2.3 per cent Chinese representation.

China, now the world’s second biggest economy, represented 14 per cent of global GDP. Hong Kong and Chinese companies made up 11 per cent of total global equity market capitalisation.

“China exerts a much larger influence on the global economy and on global markets than this (MSCI World Index) weighting would suggest,” Jiang said.

“As a result global investors are typically structurally underweight China with the existing MSCI World Index investing.”

Jiang rated health care, consumer, information technology as growth sectors and noted that on aggregate they made up less than 0.5 per cent of the MSCI World Index.

Their representation in the MSCI global emerging market index was also small.

Other attractive growth sectors such as education, tourism, energy conservation and environment protection were entirely missing from the indexes, says Jiang.

“Investors tracking these indexes do not get exposure to the sweet spots of China’s economy,” he said.

He advised a thematic investment approach to look at cross-sector themes.

Investors looking for additional exposure to these future growth areas should invest in a much less constrained portfolio which was benchmark unaware and had no specific sector guidelines, Jiang said.

A range of satellite-China products offered equity investment portfolios with this capacity.

One response to “China expert warns on bad positioning”

  1. With so much bubble built in Asia now, portfolio need to be re-balanced for risks.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How many top100 sustainable companies do you invest in?

The most sustainable 100 companies in the world, as measured by Corporate Knights, outperformed the MSCI by 12.4 per cent since the list’s inception in February 2005, it was announced at Davos last week. From February 1, 2005, to December 31, 2011, the “Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations” list has achieved a total return of

Real economy the focus of bankers at Davos

A strong financial services sector is an integral part of solving the world’s “real challenges” of unemployment, poverty and global imbalances Josef Ackermann, chief executive of Deutsche Bank and chair of the financial services governor’s group at the World Economic Forum, says. Speaking at the 2102 annual meeting in Davos last week, Ackermann, says “we

Do you get what you pay for?

A pay-for-performance measure of chief investment officers in the US has revealed paying more for an executive does not translate to better performance. Developed by executive recruitment firm, Charles Skorina & Company, the index is calculated by assessing an institution’s investment returns over the past five years, and measuring it against the salary of the

How to tackle pay structures

The remuneration of pension fund investment executives is a sticking point in the industry. To compete with the open market, attract and retain a certain calibre of executive, and compensate them for the peculiarities of being a fiduciary, there is a certain minimum required. At the same time this has to be balanced with communication

Investors collaborate on governance guide

A practical guide to good governance for pension board trustees was one of the results of the Rotman ICPM Board Effectiveness Program which included participants from 21 funds from nine countries.

Can stability bonds save the eurozone?

A majority of investors believe “stability bonds” could provide a partial solution to the euro zone sovereign debt crisis, but are concerned that these bonds carry a high moral-hazard risk, a CFA institute poll reveals. The poll found 55 per cent of European investment professionals believe that the common issuance of stability bonds can help

Previous