CalPERS undertakes large-scale board reforms

CalPERS is undertaking sweeping changes to the way its board operates as part of a package of governance reforms to be rolled out in the coming year.

The comprehensive governance project, led by board president Rob Feckner (pictured), includes a clearer delineation between the role of executive staff and the board in day-to-day management; an overhaul of reporting to the board; and a closer link between performance and compensation.

The reforms were instigated in August and the fund has been working with Funston Advisory Services, which conducted a detailed study this year on the fund’s governance practices.

The report was completed in September and contains several initiatives already agreed to by the CalPERS board designed to: “further strengthen the accountability, efficiency, transparency and ethics at the nation’s largest public pension fund”.

The changes strengthens the position of the chief executive and chief investment officer, with the number of senior staff reporting directly to the board halved to just these two executives.

The chief investment officer retains investment autonomy and authority to hire, fire and decide the compensation of investment staff.

Sponsored Content

Staff compensation processes will be streamlined, with the board focusing on the whether staff are meeting agreed benchmarks and objectives of the fund.

“The board will evaluate direct report performance and compensation based on the agreed-upon strategy, performance outcomes and metrics, not just activities,” the Funston report says.

In addition, executives to the level of senior portfolio managers will be required to certify annually in writing that they have been free from undue influence from “individual board member, executive or third party”.

The governance reforms will also see some crucial investment decisions made behind closed doors.

The board and/or its committees will establish closed sessions where it will meet selected executives who report regularly to the board, or to make significant investment decisions.

The board will develop a “confidentiality policy” that applies to what the report describes as “personnel matters, contract negotiations and sensitive investment information”.

Disciplinary action will be taken against staff, board members or external parties who breach the policy.

Along with these changes, the CalPERS board will also undergo a more rigorous assessment of its performance. This will include self-assessment and assessment by an independent third party. The assessment will also take into account evaluation from staff.

The reform process has also formalised the different roles of the executive team and the board.

 

“The board will continue to further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its governance processes by increasing their focus on important strategic issues and reducing the number and length of committee meetings and the amount of time devoted to board matters,” the report says.

“This would help minimize unnecessary board involvement in operational matters.”

The committee structure of the board has been changed, with a specific governance committee charged with managing the ongoing reform process.

The fund has also consolidated the various responsibilities of the benefits and program administration committee into other committees, cutting the number of committees by one.

The new committee structure will take effect at the beginning of 2012.

The board will also undertake an annual report into its effectiveness and performance, as well as undertake a more focused self-development program.

The program has also laid out a number of processes outlined to improve the formulation and direction of the agenda items for committees and the board.

This will cover how the board is kept appraised of escalating issues, as well as streamline how committees and the board interact.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous