CalPERS punishes BlackRock for Stuy Town disaster

Another page has turned in the history of the Stuyvesant Town – Peter Cooper Village apartment buildings in New York, as iconic as they have been controversial since their initial construction in the 1940s. CalPERS, America’s largest pension fund, has terminated BlackRock, one of its property managers which led a 2006 purchase of the 80-acre site, after a 12-year relationship.

CalPERS wrote off US$500 million of its apartment portfolio after real estate manager Tishman Speyer Properties, which together with BlackRock and investors paid $5.4 billion for what the residents call “Stuy Town”, had given up control of the properties to avoid bankruptcy in January this year.

This week CalPERS terminated a $1 billion apartment management mandate with BlackRock, which had dated back to 1998. The fund has consolidated this with another long-time manager, the privately owned GID Investment Advisers.

The Stuy Town development marked the first major clearing of slum dwellings in New York, starting in 1943, financed largely by the insurer MetLife, which was awarded tax breaks and other government assistance.

It has been the subject of many court actions over the years, some on the basis of race. Courts ruled that the managers did not have to adhere to race discrimination laws applicable for public landlords, despite the government assistance in the development, and almost all the early tenants in the rent-controlled apartments were white.

CalPERS reported a loss of 37 per cent in its total real estate portfolio in the year to June. The fund is anticipating reduced costs and improved efficiency from consolidating its mandates under one partner/manager.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous