CalPERS limits derivatives use

In line with its recently-approved leverage policy, the $181 billion fund for Californian public employees, CalPERS, has reviewed its derivatives policy for global equities, with notional leverage constrained to a new limit of 10 per cent of the value of the global equities portfolio.

In addition, guidelines to implementing derivatives will be written to cover each derivative strategy in CalPERS’ investment office.

At a minimum those guidelines will include: the purpose of the derivative strategy; justification for the use of derivatives; a description of the risks inherent in the strategy and how they will be managed including pricing, liquidity and legal risk; and procedures for monitoring and managing the derivative exposure relative to the strategy including protocols for prompt reporting of the violation of limits.

This new derivatives policy brings the existing synthetic enhanced equity portfolios in line with the recently-approved leverage policy, which was adopted in May and set out various definitions of leverage and methods for monitoring leverage across all of CalPERS assets.

In the leverage policy, “notional leverage” is defined as “exposure to non-cash-like-securities, that exceeds the value of the capital employed”.

In the most recent asset allocation review, approved this month, the allocation to global equities was reduced to 49 per cent (from 56 per cent).

Sponsored Content

Within its internally managed enhanced equities portfolio, the investment team is permitted to use financial futures, equity swaps and options permitting the investment dividends received, equitise cash and dividends receivable; adjust portfolio risk characteristics in the most cost-effective manner; and facilitate investment of cash flows related to contributions, withdrawals, or asset allocation compliance.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous