Broader engagement at UNPRI

The United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI) will expand its focus beyond the micro focus of ESG implementation for its signatories to include thought-leadership research and public and policy debate, writes Amanda White.

James Gifford, executive director at UNPRI, said the new strategy came out of its board meeting last week in Australia and would include its own internal research function.

“UNPRI is uniquely positioned to contribute to a more sustainable system,” he says.

“We are building on a micro focus of supporting our signatories in implementing principles, but given the problems in the financial system as a whole, UNPRI is uniquely positioned to make a contribution to the solution to a sustainable financial system that delivers returns to members, beneficiaries and customers and also benefits the environment and society.”

He says one of the problems is the misalignment of incentives in the industry.

“You often hear super funds are long term, and most corporations are very long term, but the intermediaries that connect them are very short term,” he says.

Sponsored Content

“Asset owners are in the driving seat. It is up to them to incentivise managers appropriately.

“We don’t have any answers at this stage, but UNPRI is well positioned to have a look at these issues to create a more sustainable system.”

He says UNPRI will work closely with its signatories, which now number more than 1000, to develop an internal research capability and agenda.
“We want to engage more in public debate around these issues more than in the past. We are canvassing signatories on what they feel we should work on.”

Chair of the UNPRI, Wolfgang Engshuber, said the organisation needs to be more vocal.

“We need to have a public voice, be a thought leader and engage with signatories and policy makers.”

David Atkin, chief executive of the Australian superannuation fund, Cbus, and UNPRI board member, says funds are long-term investors but are driven by short-term incentives.

“We need to understand the issues and collaborate. A lot of focus in the industry is on how we can outperform our peers, but [we] need to see our economies performing well. We don’t focus enough as an industry on the beta, and supporting productive economies.

“We need to collaborate and have a strong voice on these debates. We have been mute in very dramatic times.”

One response to “Broader engagement at UNPRI”

  1. Mike Tyrrell

    Definitions will be an issue and it will be particularly important to distinguish between:
    a) ‘Sustainable’ as in ‘contributes to sustainable development’
    b) ‘Sustainable’ as in ‘can be sustained under a business as usual scenario’
    c) Long-term

    The PRI will need to be very clear on which of these it aims to pursue – as they are often mutually exclusive.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous