Arizona expands allocation ranges, freezes private investments

The $27 billion Arizona State Retirement System has extended its asset allocation ranges and postponed the approval of new commitments to private market investments until the end of June, unless an overriding investment opportunity exception exists.

The delay on new private market allocations is an extension of the fund’s decision in January to postpone until March allocations to investments with locked-up capital in private equity, private real estate, opportunistic investment. The fund has a target allocation of 6 per cent to real estate, and 5 per cent to private equity, with a zero allocation to opportunistic, but a range of up to 5 per cent.

At the fund’s investment meeting last week the committee decided to extend its asset allocation ranges on equities and fixed income from plus or minus 5 per cent, to 10 per cent, in the hope an extended range may reduce the need for rebalancing that is inconsistent with the ASRS relative value perspective.

The proposed new ranges are 35 to 55 per cent for US equity, 8 to 28 per cent for international equity, and 16-26 per cent for US fixed income. Prior to this approval the ranges were 26 to 36 per cent for US large cap equities, 5 to 9 per cent for US mid cap equities, and 5 to 9 per cent for US small cap equities. At the moment there is an 18 per cent allocation to international equities, and a 26 per cent allocation to US fixed income.

The fund’s investment management division, along with consultants New England Pension Consultants (NEPC) and Mercer, also recommended the opportunistic investment committee consider rescinding the approval of global tactical asset allocation mandates and reclassify the funds allocated to US equity, and non-US equity and fixed income.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous