Are hedge fund investors getting what they paid for?

Alternative hedge fund beta allows investors to access the returns generated by hedge funds without the pressures of finding alpha, says Fama family professor of finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Tobias Moskowitz.

Moskowitz says there are three components to hedge fund returns: unique alpha, traditional market beta, and “something else”, which he calls alternative hedge fund beta and describes as the common risk/reward exposures shared by hedge funds.

Over time, he says, the alpha component of what hedge fund managers are delivering has been shrinking.

“Betas are larger than market neutral or absolute return managers claim,” Moskowitz says. “Alpha as a concept has shrunk but the opportunity set is still the same.

“If you look at what’s inside hedge funds, there are some hedge funds with unique alpha, there is also a lot of traditional market beta, but there is also something in between. This alternative beta gives you access to alternatives without having to find the alpha.”

Hedge fund managers are paid to deliver alpha, but Moskowitz thinks the returns of hedge funds are highly correlated and he questions what investors are actually paying for.

Sponsored Content

“Alphas are smaller than average returns, you’re paying fees for index-fund components,” he says.

There has been a disconnect between what investors want from hedge funds and what they have been delivering.

By way of example, he says, over past few years the absolute return indexes have been closely correlated with the MSCI World Index.

The CS Tremont Hedge Fund index has a correlation with the MSCI of 0.83 over five years, and with the HFRI Hedge Fund Index of 0.91.

“Finding historical alpha is easy, he says, but finding future alpha is very difficult,” Moskowitz says.

“People spend too little time on whether they have the right betas, and too much time on alpha.”

Alpha and beta provide the tools for investors to achieve the goals of a higher reward for lower risk, but investors often get confused in the nomenclature, he says.

Furthermore, the alphas and betas are hard to measure for hedge funds, due to the self-reporting of returns, the illiquid instruments that are used and the lack of transparency.

A way to access this alternative beta, alternative hedge fund risk premia (the common risk factors associated with alternative or hedge fund strategies) is through managed futures.

“Simple managed futures strategies capture a significant portfolio of manager returns,” he says.

Studying the manager and index returns reveals significant exposure to multiple signals.

A way to capture this is to construct simple managed futures strategies across multiple asset classes, and regress the returns of the largest managed futures managers and indexes on the strategies’ returns.

“This applies a systematic quant style to a set of diversified and liquid instruments with trades triggered on trend-following or momentum signals,” he says.

Moskowitz, who also holds a research associate position at the National Bureau of Econoimc Research, is an adviser to AQR, which has $2.4 billion of its $47.5 billion in managed futures.

 

His award-winning papers can be accessed here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous