Alaska Permanent looks to emerging markets

The Alaska Permanent Fund Board of Trustees was educated on the changing risk profiles of emerging-market debt at its meeting in February, with chair, Bill Moran, suggesting the asset class could have a greater role in the fund’s portfolio in the future.

The board reviewed presentations on emerging market debt presented by two of the corporation’s real-return managers, Goldman Sachs and PIMCO. They manage US$545 million and US$575 million for the fund respectively.

“Emerging market stocks and bonds have been included in the fund’s portfolios for some time now,” said Bill Moran (pictured), board chair. “However, we learned that the growth potential in emerging market countries, combined with the efforts toward transparency and stability these countries are making has lowered the overall risk for their corporate and government bonds. With rising debt levels and struggling economies in the developed markets, emerging market debt may have a greater role in the future.”

The fund, which has an unaudited value of US$39.5 billion, has held investments in emerging markets for some time now: more than 10 years for equities and five years for fixed income. The APFC’s high-yield bond managers also have the ability to invest in emerging market debt.  The fund does not have target allocations for emerging-market equity or debt.

At the meeting, the board also reviewed Callan Associates’ capital markets outlook and approved changes to the APFC by-laws and corporate governance charter to make the documents consistent with each other and with the investment policy.

The changes included adding duties assigned to the executive director in the governance charter to the by-laws as well and a clarification of the method for amending the investment policy.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous