Alaska focuses on infrastructure

Infrastructure co-investments will be a new area of focus for the $36.6 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, as reflected in changes to its strategic asset allocation last week.

In July 2009 the fund changed the way it allocated assets – looking at underlying risks or economic conditions, not asset buckets – with a view to building an all-weather portfolio. It came up with five categories: company exposures, real assets, special opportunities, interest rates and cash.

This latest asset allocation tweak sees company exposures increase by 2 per cent to 55 per cent of the allocation, and infrastructure increase from 3 to 4 per cent.

The special opportunities bucket has been reduced as a result from 21 to 18 per cent.

While the company exposures allocation has been increased, it will not require new mandates, as existing mezzanine debt and credit opportunity mandates have been transferred from the special opportunities bucket.

Within the special opportunities, Alaska has embraced the “external CIO” concept, and awarded seed mandates of $500 million to five managers – PIMCO, GMO, Bridgewater, AQR and Goldman Sachs.

Sponsored Content

At last week’s board meeting, changes to the infrastructure investment policy were approved to allow investments in infrastructure funds based on the recommendation of an independent fiduciary, and to add authority to co-invest subject to a board-approved process.

The 1 per cent increase in the target allocation will allow room for this asset class to grow over the next few years.

Infrastructure is part of the real assets exposure, which also includes real estate and TIPs.

The fund, which returned 20.6 per cent for the 2011 financial year, has re-elected Bill Moran (pictured) as chair and Steve Rieger as vice-chair at its annual meeting.

It is still without a chief investment officer following the resignation of Jeff Scott.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous