Alaska fills special opportunities bucket with real return mandates

The Alaska Permanent Fund will appoint four real return managers in March next year to manage a total of $2 billion in mandates that will have very few restrictions, and has shortlisted five managers to fill the brief, as part of its special opportunities bucket that makes up 21 per cent of the total fund.

Mike Burns, executive director of the $34 billion fund, said through these mandates the fund’s investment staff and trustees could observe the investment thinking of the managers and that it was an educational opportunity for staff to observe “how people think differently to us”.

The few restrictions on the mandates will be real estate and illiquid assets with more than two year lockups, as well as the requirement that a senior investment officer come to at least one board meeting at least once a year.

The approved shortlist of managers are AQR Capital, Bridgewater Associates, GMO, Goldman Sachs Asset Management and PIMCO.

The board said that all five managers have demonstrated their ability to produce superior risk-adjusted returns, with lower volatility, smaller drawdowns and higher liquidity than the other search candidates. It is expected that the four final firms will be selected and funded by March 30, 2010.

Sponsored Content

Within the special opportunities bucket the fund has also invested in commercial mortgage backed securities, distressed debt, and absolute return and has undergone a search for mezzanine debt.

The process to select the real return managers has been in conjunction with Callan Associates and originated with a shortlist of 30 managers.

As reported by conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com the board took a different approach to asset allocation this year that is a good fit for an all-weather portfolio.

Rather than taking the traditional tack of grouping investments by asset class, the board decided to group investments by their risk and return profiles, and by the market condition or liability that each group is intended to address.

Asset allocation by economic conditions

Company exposures 53%

special opportunities 21%

real assets 18%

interest rates 6%

cash 2%

 

Asset allocation by traditional asset classes, 2009

stocks 38%

bonds 22%

real estate 12%

cash 2%

infrastructure 3%

absolute return strategies 6%

private equity 6%

other 11%

 

asset allocation by economic conditions, 2009

company exposure 53%

special opportunities 21%

real assets 18%

interest rates 6%

cash 2%

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Swedish fund goes farming for diversification

The Second Swedish National Pension Fund (AP2) will invest $250 million in a joint venture with a US pension fund and financial services provider to buy farmland in the United States, Brazil and Australia.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Californian funds told to invest in their own backyard

California Treasurer Bill Lockyer (pictured) sent his deputy Steve Coony to a recent CalPERS board meeting to tell the pension fund they needed to do more to invest in their own backyard. Coony shares his views with conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com on how public pension funds can play a greater role in boosting California’s ailing economy. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

De-risking is de rigueur, survey finds

Investors are looking to continue to scale-back their exposure to US equities, increase their allocation to fixed-interest assets and strongly focus on the liability side of their balance sheets, a recent survey of funds in the US and Europe found.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Bernanke throws the dice as funds look on bemused

Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke’s speech at the International Monetary Conference this week reveals the delicate balance between the (stagnant) state of the US economy and the enormous growth of the emerging market economies.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Avoiding misinterpretation in calculating performance-based fees

Performance-based fee compensation relies on performance fee models that require that specific parameters be clearly stipulated in the investment management agreeement. This case study is one example of the misinterpretation that can occur when the fee model’s parameters are not specifically defined. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Commodities demand a fundamentally active approach

Investing in commodities via passive strategies presents some unique challenges due in part to the structure of futures contracts. GE Asset Management which has been managing commodities for the GE pension fund for five years, and opened that expertise to external clients last year, believes a better approach is active management using fundamentals. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous