Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk.

Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing director for research and academic relations at Moody’s, Roger Stein, the Consortium for Systemic Risk Analytics was founded to provide a platform for institutional investors, academics and industry experts to present and discuss new research and better quantify drivers of systemic risk.

 

Collaboration across the board
Systemic risk has presented a major challenge for regulators funds managers, academics and investors who have relied on the diversification tenets of modern portfolio theory for their investment allocations.

“Systemic risk was never imagined by modern portfolio theory,” Lo says. “Modern portfolio theory is now incomplete because of the complexity in financial markets.”

Stein says much of the work involves dealing with the large volumes of incompatible data. He notes that, ironically, in some cases there can be too much information for investors and policy makers to evaluate. Much of the work that is now being done is about using new analytic techniques to rationalise and filter down information to something that is more actionable.

Sponsored Content

Donohue says in the end investors have to consider systemic risk in asset allocation and tactical asset allocation.

“We are creating relationships and my hope is that will result in relevant measures and ways of thinking that will help investors better manage the turbulent environment,” Donohue says.

The consortium will seek to foster collaboration between academic and industry to research the interrelatedness of markets and the potential sources of systemic risk.

 

Bringing people together
The aim of the consortium is to initiate bilateral conversations on these risks.

“We are driven by a sense of urgency. Systemic risk is not something that businesses are focusing on; it requires a collective effort. Contrary to popular belief, most financial services firms are not evil but are concerned about their impact on systemic risk and so are willing to share information about exposures in their portfolios,” Lo says.

An example of the work the consortium is doing is a “network map” that Stein and Lo developed to combine portfolio analytics and network analysis. The map outlines the relatedness of money market funds and the risks to them through exposures to non-US debt. In this case, Moody’s agreed as a one-off to provide the anonymised data to Lo and Stein. They then shared the results of their new analytic approach with the group, which included State Street, Moody’s academics as well as government organisations such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

“The notion is to bring people together who wouldn’t otherwise talk to each other, and to do so in a way that expressly addresses issues of confidentiality and complexity,” Stein says.

 

More than just quants
Lo has done much research on systemic risk, including a variety of measures and the relationships among markets and different investment holdings. “There is increasing correlation,” he says. “For example, in the hedge fund industry there is no corner that is undiscovered; all are crowded trades.”

The consortium is interdisciplinary, with Lo involving various departments of MIT in the research and discussion including physics, engineering and maths.

“Although much of the discussion focuses on financial data and analytics, we also talk about the impact of things like dependence on key computer systems as being potential sources of systemic risk. It is an active debate,” Stein notes.

State Street Global Markets, the investment research and trading arm of State Street Corporation, has produced a prolific amount of research and work through State Street Associates, its collaboration with leading academics.

Some of that work includes measures of systemic risk and turbulence in conjunction with Mark Kritzman, who also teaches at MIT. Similarly, Stein’s focus has been developing approaches to extending quantitative credit measures for applications in systemic risk analysis.

Donohue says industry consortium members do not share proprietary information, but published works, such as those of Kritzman, could be applied to share insights with the group.

The consortium will have a public website and announce new members within the next month.

 

 

One response to “Academics and industry unite”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous