Holding consultants to account on ESG

Ensuring that investment consultants incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into their core service provision is crucial for the next wave of responsible investment. Investment consultants are crucial – particularly for small and medium-sized asset owners – to understand the investment implications of ESG issues. As gatekeepers and a trusted source of knowledge, investment consultants’ advice is often accepted with little hesitation.

In December 2017, the PRI released the Investment consultant services review, examining the industry and its role in supporting asset owners with their growing need to manage ESG issues. Following several interviews with industry representatives and analysis of information reported to the PRI, we concluded that most consultants and their asset owner clients are failing to consider ESG issues in investment practice – despite a growing evidence base that demonstrates the financial materiality of ESG issues to portfolio value.

Investment consultants advise on trillions of dollars of assets globally. In the US, 84.1 per cent of defined contribution plan sponsors use investment consultants. The US DC pension market represents $7.7 trillion in assets (as of 2018); in the UK, investment consultants advise on pension scheme assets worth £1.6 trillion. Investment consultants also play an important role in Australia, Canada and Japan, as well as other markets around the world. Their service delivery on ESG issues has a multiplier effect throughout financial markets.

But there are myriad reasons why investment consultants need to up their game when it comes to ESG factors. The financial evidence base is strong, client demand for ESG products and advice is rising, and, perhaps most importantly, the industry is in the throes of dynamic and rapid transformation in policy and regulation.

In the EU, the spheres of financial and sustainability policy are coalescing at an accelerating pace, with sustainable finance groups elsewhere watching closely. Meanwhile, in the US, policy is less directional as each new administration sends slightly different signals. Despite this ambiguity, the Department of Labor has reaffirmed that, where material, fiduciaries should consider ESG factors.

Even as certain countries continue to drag their feet on sustainable finance policy, it has by and large only intensified in recent years – a trajectory we expect to continue. The cumulative and disruptive nature of the ever-growing catalogue of sustainability challenges we face mandates it.

Sponsored Content

Given the patchwork of international policy, investment consultants, particularly global firms, must adapt their service models to meet changing regulatory and client demands. The industry leaders will do best by being forward looking and incorporating ESG factors across services and geographies – and for their whole client base; the laggards will wait until they are forced to act, but this may be too late, and clients may be lost along the way.

What the PRI is doing

The PRI’s new Investment consultants and ESG: An asset owner guide prepares asset owners for what to expect from investment consultants, offering technical insights on what should be delivered at each step of the investment process. In every section there are questions that asset owners can ask existing or prospective investment consultants, to check that they have appropriate policies, processes, competencies and experience on ESG issues. The guide adds to a growing body of PRI asset owner resources.

Investment consultant signatories are required to report to the PRI about their responsible investment policies and implementation practices, but to foster industry-wide adoption we will be updating the Reporting Framework to reflect the new guide. Through the PRI’s Data Portal, asset owners can access reported information to compare how investment consultants fare on ESG practices.

Investment consultants should be proactive to meet this demand and indeed, the industry is a competitive one, where recognition of ESG factors is increasingly seen as table stakes.

We welcome the whole industry to get behind this message – we need to move from a world with pockets of ESG excellence, to one where ESG excellence is the norm.

Nicolaj Pedersen is senior manager, responsible investment programmes at PRI.

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Steinem: No more labels, just humanity

Gloria Steinem tells institutional investors it is time to ditch the labels that describe our gender, class or ethnicity and urged the investment community to look at investments through the lens of gender, class and racial equality.

Material climate change already here

The impact of climate change is already material, said Woodwell Climate Research Center’s Philip Duffy who warns that thawing permafrost could mean the loss of control of ever being able to manage climate change. Elsewhere, he urged investors to use their voice to bring about change.

How to fix a broken labour market

In an impassioned call Sharan Burrow, general secretary of the ITUC which represents 200 million workers in 163 countries called on institutional investors to do more to protect workers rights.

Nordhaus and ‘No Regrets’

Nobel Prize winner Professor William Nordhaus, Sterling Professor of Economics and Professor of Forestry and Environmental Studies at Yale University, explains his theory of ‘No Regrets’ whereby companies can integrate ESG at a level that brings real benefits for society but has limited impact on the corporate.

APG and NYC talk Amazon push back

Two of the world’s most influential institutional investors are hitting a brick wall in their attempts to engage with Amazon’s board on workplace safety. Every time the Netherland's APG and the office of New York City Comptroller, fiduciary to New York city’s five pension funds, try to engage with the board at the tech giant in which they own a combined $6.5 billion they get push back from management.

The path to net zero

Investors from Brunel, Wespath and Robeco talk about the challenges of shaping their net zero portfolios including data, benchmarks and holding managers to account.

Previous