Warnings increase as rising rates puts LDI under strain

 

Rising interest rates are placing unprecedented liquidity constraints on some of the United Kingdom’s largest corporate pension funds, prevalent users of LDI strategies. According to a recent research note from consultancy Mercer, a growing number of schemes are having to sell liquid assets like equities and investment grade corporate bonds to raise cash to maintain the level of leverage needed to ensure they can hedge their liabilities.

“To maintain leverage at acceptable levels, pooled LDI funds are issuing regular collateral calls,” says Daniel Melley, head of UK investments at Mercer. Leverage, or borrowing in order to gain more exposure to rates and inflation movements, is used within LDI mandates for risk management purposes versus the liabilities. It is also used to enable schemes to buy growth assets that otherwise would not be possible. But as interest rates track up, it is leading to losses on the gilt or swap assets held within these portfolios, in turn leading to rising leverage ratios.

Action

Meeting margin calls requires quick action, warns Melley. “In the short-term, pension funds will need to respond to collateral calls from their LDI managers in order to protect hedging levels. The key point here is that eligible assets (typically cash / gilts) will have to be made available quickly, in a matter of days.  This could be challenging, particularly where there are currency implications from selling growth assets.”

Given inflationary pressure in the economy is unlikely to abate in the short-term, it is likely that central banks will continue to increase interest rates. “If the pace exceeds the markets expectations, it will result in further strains to LDI portfolios,” predicts Melley. “A significant proportion (of pension funds) will need to act quickly to ensure they have dry powder available to meet further collateral calls, if interest rates rise further.”

Moreover, James Brundrett, senior investment consultant and partner at Mercer, warns that since interest rate rises this year have now surpassed the typical cushion set in place in LDI portfolios – a 1.5 per cent rise in long-term gilt yields – many pension funds collateral buffers are depleted. “Pension funds collateral is depleted, and we are seeing clients looking to replenish.”

Sponsored Content

The problem might not only turn pension funds into forced sellers. Some may not be able to hedge as much as they have done, and may have to accept lower hedge levels should they run out of liquid assets that could be used to top up collateral in their LDI strategies. Cue increased risk levels and potentially wider implications from a covenant, funding, investment strategy and Journey Plan perspective.

Positive

Positively, Brundrett points out that pension fund liabilities are also falling. Rising interest rates will also lead to falling liability values, potentially reducing the size of deficits and increasing the impact of contributions. “As interest rates go up hedges are losing money, but liabilities are also going down,” he says.

However, critics counter that the value of liabilities should always be seen in relationship to the value of assets, noting the value of assets may fall more than the value of the liabilities if funds have had to sell assets to meet margin calls.

“It is the difference between the value of assets and liabilities that is important, and the value of assets will fall through forced sales,” says Professor David Blake, Director, Pensions Institute, Bayes Business School, City, University of London, who argues pension funds should not be borrowing in times of economic uncertainty. “Having to sell assets in a falling market is pure speculation. It is particularly challenging if they all have to do this at the same time and liquidity disappears.”

Brundrett and Melley insist that overall LDI portfolios have passed the test of managing funding level volatility in the past decade and remain a key building block for pension fund risk management.

But important risks lie ahead. “Governance models will be called into question to see if funds have been able to react as quickly as hoped. Boards will need to know where to go if they need more collateral; if it’s not corporate bonds, where do they go?” If pension funds are forced to turn to illiquid assets, it opens a raft of new value and pricing challenges “Illiquid assets are not mark-to-market. In allocations like private equity, the pricing is out of date,” concludes Brundrett.

 

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

Sweden’s AP2 and AP6 conflict over PE investments

The Swedish government’s plans to streamline the country’s pension system and merge the $8 billion buffer fund AP6 with its larger and more diversified sibling, the $48 billion AP2, have hit a bump in the road. Major points of contention include AP6's large private equity exposures and staff integration. 

Iceland’s pension funds: Consolidation continues but size of sector a worry

Merger mania continues to grip Iceland’s pension sector, but economies of scale and greater efficiency don't solve the problem of the size of an industry now larger than the country's banking system and insurance sector combined, and more than sufficient to buy all listed investments.

CalPERS bets on outperformance from growing climate allocation

CalPERS' Peter Cashion tells Top1000funds.com how the pension fund's strategy to allocate to climate mitigation, transition and adaptation strategies is allowing it to access an untapped corner of the US market where many investors have retreated because of the policy environment.

Climate politics: BlackRock hits back at NYC Comptroller

The skirmish between the New York City Comptroller and BlackRock over climate alignment of the city’s public pension funds – a fight worth a $42 billion mandate to BlackRock – highlights the complexity and impracticality of aligning climate expectations, reporting requirements and business imperatives.

Alaska’s APFC mulls the positives of growing its small crypto exposure

The $84 billion Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation is weighing the benefits and risks of increasing its less than 1 per cent allocation to cryptocurrency following positive returns for the sovereign wealth fund. Despite the current policy tailwinds, the investor is wary about the asset class's liquidity and value drivers. 

Limited alternatives keep global capital anchored to the US

Singapore’s Temasek said while US exceptionalism may be “fraying”, there aren’t many alternative markets that can handle the same volume of global capital. Meanwhile, fellow sovereign fund GIC believes the greenback’s reserve currency status remains solid even though currency swings could spell trouble for foreign investors.

Previous