State pension funds tilt towards politically-connected stocks

It is well documented that local bias exists in US state pension fund holdings, but now an article in the Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming) finds evidence not only of local bias, but bias towards politically-connected stocks.  Not only that, but the article finds that political bias is detrimental to fund performance.

“Political bias is positively related to the percentage of politically-affiliated trustees on the board and Congressional connections,” the authors say.

“The more politically affiliated trustees on the board, the more the fund shifts toward risky asset allocations. Overall, our results imply that political bias is likely costly to taxpayers and pension beneficiaries.”

It finds that state pension funds overweight local firms that make political contributions to local state politicians or have significant lobbying expenditures by 23 per cent and 17 per cent compared with the market portfolio.

“When estimated independently, our baseline results show that local bias in general has a positive albeit insignificant impact on fund performance, whereas local political bias has a pronounced negative effect on it.

“For instance, a one standard deviation increase in local political bias results in about a 0.25 per cent to 0.28 per cent decline in quarterly equity performance.

Sponsored Content

“We find that state funds having boards with a larger percentage of politically affiliated trustees invest more in politically connected local firms and those having boards with more financial experts invest less in such firms.”

 

To read the article below

The influence of political bias in state pension funds

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Peer Group Comparison – it’s only natural

Peer comparison is not just something that nervous super fund trustees and investment managers do. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

AIMA’s Roadmap to Hedge Funds

One of the great things about hedge funds is that they have provided a field day for academic researchers to write scholarly articles on their risks and returns. Yet, for all of this scholarship, a practical roadmap to hedge funds has remained elusive. Until now. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Making Sense of Distressed Investment Opportunities

In early 2007, we started advising clients that we thought the next major investment opportunity would be in distressed securities. As the credit crisis has unfolded and the first ripples of this tidal wave have appeared, we have often been asked for our views on how to structure and fund these types of investments  mrec4inarticleinline

Unlocking future value in commercial real estate

The drive towards a sustainable, low-carbon economy presents both risks and opportunities for commercial real estate investors. Here, we consider the potential impacts on rental income, capital value and future investment returns.  mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investing In Climate Change 2009

One year ago, we published Investing in Climate Change: An Asset Management Perspective. We argued that the growing investment opportunities in climate change were driven by long-term mega-trends that would continue into the foreseeable future. One year on, the absolute necessity to act now to mitigate and adapt to climate change is even more urgent,

Realization Utility: an inbuilt bias to transact

We study the possibility that, aside from standard sources of utility, investors also derive utility from realizing gains and losses on assets that they own. We propose a tractable model of this “realization utility,” derive its predictions, and show that it can shed light on a number of puzzling facts. These include the poor trading

Previous