Limited talent pool hits diversity

Asset owners increasingly encourage their asset managers to improve diversity, but both owners and managers report the need to grow diverse talent coming into the investment industry, according to recent research from asset managers and owners including Unilever and the New York Presbyterian Hospital for Russell Investments conducted by Cerulli Associates, the global research and consulting firm.

Asset owners and managers says their efforts to recruit and hire diverse employees is limited by small pools of talent. Solutions include broadening the group of universities from which they draw talent or specifically targeting certain Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

For entry-level roles, asset managers have traditionally targeted certain universities, falling in line with “you hire who you know” thinking. Some have addressed this by expanding the group of universities from which they draw talent. Others have implemented “blind” hiring processes, where they don’t target any specific universities.

Some participants (both asset owners and managers) said that their companies have begun to broaden their focus on academic majors as well. For experienced candidates (non-entry-level roles), organizations are broadening their focus to roles outside the asset management space. Notably, for some positions that require asset management experience, this is more challenging and highlights the reason why industry participants are putting efforts into growing the pool.

Survey respondents also cited challenges in retaining diverse talent at the mid- level career point. Measures meant to address this problem include the provision of career development and mentorship programs, while employee engagement surveys help investors identify areas of “flight risk” as well as the ability to assess their level of inclusivity. Self-evaluation surveys are used to measure an organization’s level of inclusivity. Other tools used are alternative meeting formats, where employees are given the opportunity to speak their mind both before and after meetings.

The survey found firms are competing for the same limited pool of candidates for roles requiring experience in the asset management industry. This especially applies to roles requiring investment management experience.

Sponsored Content

By including diversity inquiries in their RFPs, asset owners encourage managers to consider diversity at their own organizations and adopt measures to improve. Many asset owners questioned spoke of efforts to select woman- and minority-owned firms as asset management partners. However, others say that looking at diversity at the ownership level within an asset manager is an incomplete approach, as it does not consider the diversity of the employee base.

Asset managers tend to be larger than asset owner investment offices which has several implications for their D&I approach. Namely, they are able to evaluate diversity more granularly and can gain exposure to more demographics and absorb the corresponding costs more easily.

Factors driving owner and manager’s diversity efforts include both internal and external demand. Internal demand refers to demand from within the organization – either top-down or grassroots bottom up. For institutional investors, external demand comes from end-beneficiaries and, in the case of corporates, clients that their sponsoring organizations serve.

We just need more

Some asset owners and managers told Cerulli that they do not have specific diversity benchmarks or targets. These organizations are more directional, taking the approach, “We just need more.” While they are not necessarily behind in considering diversity measures, these organizations tend to be further behind in achieving results.

“Changing the makeup of your employee base is not something that you can do quickly. You want it to happen naturally over time. That departure of early career hires is something we’ve tried to fix through development and mentorship programs. The jury is still out on trying different things. Large firms have the resources to do those things. Do smaller firms have the ability to do that? I don’t know,” said one asset owner respondent.

In addition to forming their own peer-to-peer partnerships, asset owners and managers look to partner with third-party organizations specifically formed to address diversity. Examples of these third parties include non-profits such as Girls Who Invest, The Robert Toigo Foundation, and Invest in Girls.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous