Climate agreement marks turning point

Days of intense negotiations at the long-awaited COP21 meeting in Paris have seen a definitive agreement emerge on climate change. Delegates from almost 200 countries voted to endorse the first universal, legally binding effort to tackle global warming. Fiona Reynolds, managing director of PRI, was there.

The deal commits countries to try to keep global temperature rises “well below” 2 degrees Centigrade, the level that is necessary in order to mitigate the most devastating effects of climate change. It also requires developed nations to continue providing funding for poorer countries as they struggle to create new low emission intensity growth paths.

While we hail the new climate agreement as a breakthrough that many people have been working towards, we need to remember that it’s a beginning and not an end in itself.

But the deal must be seen as a foundation for action; that is, a signal to global financial markets, triggering a transition from investment in coal, oil and gas as primary energy sources to zero-carbon energy sources like wind, solar and nuclear.

The agreement requires countries to reconvene every five years starting in 2020 to publicly report on their progress in cutting emissions compared with their original plans. The investor voice must support this process.

The PRI welcomed the general recognition by all stakeholders of the pivotal role of private finance in achieving INDCs (country-level plans) and emissions reduction goals. This acknowledgment will give additional encouragement to institutional investors, both asset owners and managers.

Sponsored Content

One factor that made this year’s COP21 different was investors finding their voice earlier in 2015 and seizing the initiative on climate issues. The Global Investor Statement on Climate Change was signed by over 400 investors representing $24 trillion AUM. A coalition of 25 institutional investors with over £45 billion ($67 billion) AUM called on nine publicly listed companies to review their membership of lobbying groups that seek to undermine EU climate policy.

BHP Billiton, BP, EDF, Glencore, Johnson Matthey, Proctor and Gamble, Rio Tinto, Statoil and Total are companies whose professed climate policies are undermined in the eyes of some investors by their membership of lobby groups with a track record of obstruction on climate-change policy. The post-Paris spotlight is now firmly on those boards to publicly resolve this fundamental contradiction.

While the agreement places commitments on governments and sets further timetables, investors are not passively waiting for 2020. They are already taking action to measure their carbon exposure through the PRI Montreal Carbon Pledge, signed by over 120 investors, as well as taking steps to decarbonise their portfolios.

Investors are also making commitments to low-carbon, climate-resilient and green investment opportunities.

Leading PRI signatories are actively engaging with companies on business planning around the transition to a low-carbon economy, future investment opportunities and full transparency around political and climate lobbying activities.

Many of our signatories, including Allianz, AXA, Caisse des Depots, CalPERS, Old Mutual and HESTA pension fund, have already taken a stance on climate finance and carbon risk issues. The PRI is working across its membership base to deepen investor awareness and understanding of climate issues and to formulate responses to key climate finance questions. To that end, the PRI, together with other organisations, has launched a new Green Infrastructure Coalition to mobilise capital to meet the growing need for climate-resilient infrastructure development that supports INDCs and global targets. The Paris Climate Agreement now gives investors further impetus to act.

Clearly, the finance community has emerged as a formidable partner in the climate-change dialogue. In addition to highlighting the threats from climate changes, investors also have a chance to take the new commercial opportunities that climate change presents, from clean energy initiatives to new infrastructure and advanced technologies to help mitigate pollution, build resiliency and limit human impact on the environment – all the while creating new markets, jobs and export opportunities. Investors that think long term will benefit from these new initiatives.

Finally, PRI congratulates the various parties, and in particular the French Government, the UN and the UNFCCC led by Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres, on their leadership and commitment to a successful COP21 outcome. Well done.

It is now up to asset owners and managers, the universal investors, to work with governments and other stakeholders and ensure that the agreement becomes a reality in the coming years and that the next agreement is even stronger.

Leave a Comment

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

Canada's HOOPP has officially adopted the total portfolio approach since the start of 2026. Unpacking the move, the fund's managing director and head of total portfolio group Jacky Lee writes that while the approach doesn't magically make the return better, the fact that it frees the investment team from outdated processes and gives investment leaders the flexibility to act is what gives it an edge.

Sort content by

Long-termism, the problems with capitalism and other holiday reading

The holiday season is a good time to catch up on the reading you may have put off throughout the year. To make it easy for you here is a choice of articles that speak to some of the key themes for investors – long-termism, economic growth, climate risk and capitalism. Long-termism is one of

How to hedge long-term inflation-linked liabilities without inflation-linked instruments

Given the capacity constraints on local inflation-linked bond markets, what are other options for hedging long-term inflation-linked liabilities? This is a question Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan has been deliberating on as it supports an academic chair at EDHEC-Risk Institute with a focus on analysing the design of novel forms of liability-hedging portfolios that do not

What, really, are your pension liabilities?

Liabilities in UK pension schemes are grossly under-estimated with the current valuation system not recognising  the perilous funding position in both corporate and public systems. The implications for not addressing this include huge financial costs borne unfairly by younger members of the schemes. Stefan Lundbergh, head of innovation, and Andrew Stewart, client manager at Cardano,

Towards a new generation of pension funds in Australia

Numerous surveys suggest that Australians are not completely satisfied with superannuation as it exists today. First, fund members tend to think that they will not have enough to retire and second, that investment plan providers are not necessarily acting in their best interest. In this context, we asked in a recent study supported by AXA

Are your managers as active as you think they are?

Measuring how active managers actually are is a useful tool for investors. A metric called “active share” can be used by institutional investors to assess active fees, measure and monitor managers styles and maintain portfolio diversification. By Thusith I. Mahanama, chief executive of Assette. Seven years ago, professors Martijn Cremers and Antti Petajisto introduced a

Is chasing lower taxes really a strategy for value creation?

Investors are just beginning to understand global tax issues and the risks associated with aggressive tax planning by the companies int their portfolios, Fiona Reynolds, managing director of PRI says there are a number of common-sense measures that companies should begin to put in place.   The 2014 G20 Summit to be held in Australia

Previous