OMERS shifts to direct investing privately

As OMERS moves towards its target asset allocation of 53:47 in public/private markets, the private equity division is also undergoing change with a preference for direct investing. Paul Renaud (pictured), president and chief executive of OMERS Private Equity, discusses the transformation.

In the past seven years the target asset allocation of the $53 billion Canadian fund, OMERS, has seen a dramatic shift towards private markets. In 2004 the target asset allocation was 82:18 in favour of public markets, and now that target ratio sits at 53:47.

The actual portfolio is around 60:40 public/private, so there is still some way to go to achieve the anticipated balance. But the idea remains that a shift away from the volatility of public markets, and towards the more stable, better returns and more even cashflow of the private markets, will benefit the fund.

Within the private markets allocation sits OMERS Private Equity, Oxford Properties Group, and Borealis Infrastructure, which together make up the 47 per cent allocation to private markets.

President and chief executive of OMERS Private Equity, Paul Renaud, says at one time each of the three asset buckets had targets, but now management has the flexibility to respond to investment opportunities. Of the current 40 per cent invested in private markets, private equity makes up just under 12 per cent (infrastructure is around 16 and real estate 13 per cent).

The fund’s private equity investment strategy has been undergoing an interesting transition in the past two and a half years, with the focus now very firmly on direct investments.

Sponsored Content

“In 2004/05 we had about 20 per cent direct and 80 per cent invested in private equity firms. That is about 45 per cent active now and 55 per cent passive,” Renaud says.

There has also been a decision not to make any further passive investments beyond the remaining $3 billion that sits with private equity firms.

“That investment period is soon coming to an end, but it is still out of our control, when a private equity firm makes an exit, we’ll get the money,” he says.

Instead of investing through funds, OMERS recently has preferred to make direct majority ownership investments, and to that end has been in competition with private equity firms.

Renaud says one advantage of the pension fund is that it has no fixed-fund terms, giving it more flexibility.

But just because the fund is competing for assets this does not mean it does not have a good relationship with those private equity firms, and testament to that is a commitment to co-investment if the opportunity is right.

OMERS has co-invested on the infrastructure side of the business, as the deals tend to be larger, and is open to it in private equity.

But overwhelmingly, the fund is focused on majority ownership with Renaud highlighting the fund has eight portfolio companies where it is majority owner and a further 10 or 12 where it has sufficient capital to influence the company.

“We are less likely to invest in a company where we have 20 per cent, as we are less likely to influence the company,” he says.

With that in mind, in the past couple of years OMERS has focused on building a team with the right makeup, as well as expansion into New York and London.

“If you’re doing it yourself, you have to build the team to provide the opportunity. We’re well placed here,” Renuad says. “It is important as we build the team to find the individual that fits our DNA but can lead in that market.”

There is also a compensation model that is consistent with a more corporate model of base salary and short-term and long-term incentives. It seems to be working, with the team of just over 20 now an award winner, receiving the Canadian Dealmakers Mid Market Private Equity Award with Société générale de financement du Québec for their acquisition of Logibec Groupe Informatique Ltée in July 2010.

The team is very much focused on due diligence and negotiation, and companies that have good services and management teams.

“We are not turn-around people. We are looking for good services and good management teams, not a distressed company and change management, but where is the value creation,” Renaud says.

“We do due diligence with a top accounting firm to help on finance, and a management consulting firm. A big part of our focus is how realistic are the finance assumptions and conditions the forecasts are based on,” he says.

A broad aim is to double the size of a company in five years, and the fund’s investment in Golf Town is a good example of a successful strategy.

The company had 32 stores in Canada, was listed and had some capital constraints. OMERS delisted the company, tripled the rollout of stores, knocking the competition out of the market, and moved into the US.

While the private equity team is focused on portfolio diversification, Renaud says a sector in which the fund has done a few deals and “is hard not to like” is healthcare.

“It’s a good space to be in, it’s where the demographic trends are and good organic growth,” he says.

Leave a Comment

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

Jase Auby, TRS's celebrated CIO, explains why TPA doesn't fit with its culture; why community push back on data centres could turn out to be an investor advantage, and argues the case for continuing to invest in fossil fuels. Top1000funds.com sat down with the CIO in his Austin office for an all-encompassing conversation.

Sort content by

Namibia’s challenge: development and depreciation

Namibia maybe one of the youngest countries in Africa but it has nurtured one of the continent’s biggest pension funds into life since gaining independence from South Africa in 1990. The Windhoek-based N$61-billion ($6.8-billion) Government Institutions Pension Fund, GIPF, accounts for over three quarters of Namibia’s entire pension assets and is the only defined benefit

CERN fund: the collision of investment ideas?

Its core business involves expanding the realm of science by beaming particles close to the speed of light and it invented the web – as we know it – as a nice little side project. You would perhaps then expect the CHF 3.6-billion ($3.9-billion) pension fund of the European Organisation for Nuclear Research, CERN, to

NZ Super: contrarian Kiwis rewrite rules

No one who works at New Zealand Super has a business card that has an asset class attached to it. This simple representation speaks volumes to the investment approach taken by the fund. One could work for the strategy team or the investment analysis team, but the investment structure by which NZ Super invests, such

NOW: Pensions crosses borders

In the city of Hillerød outside Copenhagen in Denmark, a small group of Danes want to teach the United Kingdom’s pensions industry a thing or two. Where UK trustees tend to see fund choice as a blessing, Denmark’s DKK579-billion ($101.6-billion) public pension plan ATP has always viewed picking and choosing between different managers as more

Autumnal Danish fund shows spring growth

Innovation is associated more with bold new businesses than gently declining ones, but Denmark’s Lønmodtagernes Dyrtidsfond (LD) is embracing change as it enters its final years. The pension fund’s inevitable disappearance has nothing to do with any lack of competitiveness or poor investment returns – the 9.9-per-cent net return it generated in 2012 is testament

KLM funds ride out de-risking turbulence

Pension funds can face a lot of turbulence in the course of their investing journey and many funds thrown into shortfalls have found the need to de-risk their portfolios. There might be a few investment officers at those funds casting an enviable eye upwards to the pension fund of Dutch flag-carrying airline KLM. Toine van

Previous