NZ Super pares back tilts

New Zealand Super has pulled back its strategic tilting positions for the first time since the program was introduced in 2009, as it sees most asset classes returning to long-term fair value.

The strategy has added an annualised return of 1.2 per cent for the NZ$34 billion ($24 billion) sovereign wealth fund since inception; however, David Iverson, head of asset allocation at New Zealand Super, says prices are now closer to fair valuations, so the relative sizes of the tilt positions will be pared back.

The tilting decisions are driven by the fund’s view on how current prices compare with estimates of the fair value of assets based on long-term fundamental and economic factors.

Even though the tilting is executed through short-term trades, Iverson is firm that it is a long-term strategy, because it is all based on long-term valuations. Momentum, for example, is not a signal the fund uses in its tilting decisions, because it is a short-term behavioural signal.

The relative sizes of the positions are determined by how far current prices have deviated from the fund’s assessment of fair value and the relative confidence in tilting that asset.

“We started this program after the [global financial crisis] and have had those positions on for a long time. Now we see prices closer to our fair valuations and there is less opportunity,” Iverson says. “This is new for us…Prices are closer to our fair values in equities and currencies.

Sponsored Content

“One of our beliefs is that a long-horizon investor can outperform short-horizon investors. We can do everything short-horizon investors can do, and more,” Iverson says. “The illiquidity premium is a fact, but that is not the only way to act long term. You can also take advantage of short-term activities.”

More active in unlisted assets

The fund does its strategic tilting in-house, and has a team of four dedicated to it, partly to reduce transaction costs, but primarily because of the difficulty in getting a manager to maintain the discipline of acting long term while transacting in the short term.

While the strategic tilting program, which has done much of the heavy lifting for the fund over the past seven years, will not be as active, the fund is taking active risk in a number of other areas, particularly in unlisted, including timber – which is run internally – distressed debt and life settlements.

All of its active risk decisions are based on a long-term outlook.

“For example, in distressed credit, we look at where we are in the cycle and how attractive it is, our views on loan default rates, downgrades versus upgrades, spreads in the credit bands, where we are in the cycle and the ride through. We have been in distressed for a while. We were in European distressed debt, now the US has started sparking and we’re looking at that,” he says.

The fund’s timber allocations are primarily managed in-house, while European distressed debt is managed externally (by Bain), as is US life settlements (by Apollo).

New Zealand Super uses a reference portfolio to benchmark the performance of its actual investment portfolio and the value it is adding through active investment strategies. The reference is a low-cost, passive, listed investments portfolio split 80:20 between growth and fixed income investments.

About two-thirds of the fund is invested passively and in line with the reference.

As an active investor, NZ Super then adds value to the fund using illiquid assets, manager selection and trading activities.

The fund’s active risk falls into five baskets: asset selection; market pricing – arbitrage, credit and funding; market pricing – broad markets; market pricing – real assets; and structural.

The strategic tilting falls into the market pricing – broad markets bucket. Timber and life settlements fall into the structural bucket.

At the end of February 2017, the actual asset-class exposure of the fund was global equities (66 per cent), fixed income (11 per cent), timber (5 per cent), private equity (5 per cent), New Zealand equities (4 per cent), infrastructure (3 per cent), other private markets (3 per cent), other public markets (2 per cent) and rural farmland (1 per cent).

In the 12 months to the end of March 2017, the fund returned 23.14 per cent versus the reference portfolio of 19.78 per cent; in effect, adding 3.36 percentage points over the year.

Since inception in 2003, New Zealand Super has returned 10.04 per cent, versus the reference portfolio of 8.67 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

UK local authority funds question “bigger is best”

UK local authority schemes are under pressure to merge. It’s their turn to suggest ways in which pooling investments, or adminstriation, could achieve the economies of scale necessary for survival, but many are resisting the notion that “bigger is better” when it comes to investments.   The United Kingdom’s local government pension schemes have begun

Finding wriggle room in North Dakota

The monthly income pouring into the $1.3-billion North Dakota Legacy Fund arrives as thick and fast as fracking technology and new pipeline networks can draw the state’s oil and gas reserves to the surface. But investment strategy at the fund, set up in 2008 when it was portioned 30 per cent of the tax dollars

Innovating investment beliefs

The concept of investment beliefs is the basis for strategic management and, while widely used in other parts of the world, is “innovative” from a US perspective, Allan Emkin, managing director of Pension Consulting Alliance, says. In a session at the Risk Summit, convened by World Pension Forum and Conexus Financial, publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Emkin

Assessing reality in US public funds

Distinct regulation of United States public pension funds that links the liability discount rate to expected return on assets, rather than to the riskiness of their promised benefits, sets them apart – in a bad way. US public funds have underperformed other pension fund cohorts because of higher allocations to risky assets. Arguably, regulation is

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Norway opens a window on its global investment strategy

On March 8 when Yngve Slyngstad announced the annual results of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, he did more than unveil a routine set of numbers. The chief executive of The Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), was also revealing the first results following what he called a “substantial” change

Previous